User talk:Robertjkoenig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Puppeteer template.gif

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Robertjkoenig for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.


Welcome!

Hello Robertjkoenig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

It looks like you have some interesting things to say; your edit to the Talk page for USAA is a good start. Unfortunately, you've run afoul of the three revert rule, so let the article be for a while and see what the other editors have to say on the talk page. Then, when everybody can agree, somebody will go back and edit the main article. Don't get discouraged! Lunkwill 12:24, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for contacting me in reference to the USAA page! I think it would be better if we discussed this on the USAA talk page so that other Wikipedians can put forth thier thoughts and an article that is factual and neutral can be agreed upon. Movementarian 03:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

USAA talk page[edit]

Here's a link just to make sure you know which page we're talking about: Talk:USAA; to get there, you'd click the "discussion" link at the top of the USAA article. Lunkwill 07:47, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Bit of a grudge?[edit]

Bob, go easy on the USAA page. I realize you are not the biggest fan 1 but stupid revisions are useless

Uploading PDFs[edit]

Assuming the PDF you mention is a verifiable legal document in the public domain (and doesn't have any copyright issues), the place to put it, as with all primary source material, would be WikiSource, at which point it can be linked to from Wikipedia. Lunkwill 08:40, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

USAA talk page (again)[edit]

Please dicuss your recent edits at the USAA talk page. Thank you. Movementarian 16:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Talk:USAA. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- xaosflux Talk/CVU 01:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

This came up in a RC Patrol blanking info, if this was all your own talk, please disregard this message. xaosflux Talk/CVU 01:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Do not delete comments[edit]

robertjkoening this is the last time I will ask you to stop deleting comments from the USAA talk page. It is a form of vandalism and is not tolerated. I have posted this on your talk page in the hopes that you will cease this type of behaviour. If it occurs again I will report it to an administrator. Movementarian 07:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

POV edits[edit]

From Talk:USAA, posted here to ensure it is observed.

Attention User:Zorro redux, User:Robertjkoenig, and associated sockpuppets. When making edits to this and any other Wikipedia article, please refrain from placing blatently POV statements within them. Please refer to the following helpful resources:

  1. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
  2. How to write a great article
  3. Naming conventions
  4. Manual of Style
  5. What Wikipedia is not
  6. Neutral point of view

Also please refrain from copy and pasting large chunks of information from the archived talk page to the current talk page. If it is relevant you can refer to it or summarize it. Pasting it here defeats the purpose of archiving.

Please take this advice to heart, if information regarding your arrest is posted to another Wikipedia page I will proceed to the next step in the dispute resolution process. I will be monitoring this page and it's associated pages. Your contributions are welocome so long as they adhere to established policies. Thank you and happy new year. Movementarian 08:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

I've blocked you for 24 hours for using the accounts User:Robertjkoenig and User:Zorro redux to repeatedly insert the same material into the articles USAA, Talk:USAA, Unincorporated reciprocal inter-insurance exchange, and possibly other articles. It appears that you have mistaken Wikipedia for a personal blog. If you feel that you can edit Wikipedia constructively, feel free to come back in 24 hours. --Carnildo 08:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

RfC[edit]

I have started a Request for Comment concerning your edits on Wikipedia. If you would like to particiapte in the discussion, please go to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Robertjkoenig. Movementarian 16:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/robertjkoenig, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GB fan 11:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)