User talk:Roofflat

This is Roofflat's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visar Kastrati (December 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Visar Kastrati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roofflat

As you came to live chat for feedback, here is the current list of sources with notes. Note that sources are required to be

independent (not published by article subject or an affiliated body)
reliable (peer reviewed, so youtube does not work)
in-depth (not a passing mention)

Here is the current list of sources for the draft:

Not in depth. Fails criteria 3 (in depth) -- Sources 1, 2, 3. By uefa.com. Union of European Football Associations. 13 February 2017. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
Not independent, as this is the official page. Fails criteria 1 (independent) -- Source 4. "Visar Kastrati delegohet nga UEFA në ndeshjen e grupeve të Ligës së Konferencës: Gent – Shamrock Rovers". FFK. Federata e Futbollit e Kosovës. 18 December 2022. Retrieved 18 December 2022.

Please view Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Notability (sports) for the requirements.

Please, let me know if you have any questions. Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 22:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryllida,

Hope you are doing well. I kindly ask if you can review/accept my draft, after the improvement.

Regards,

Visar Roofflat (talk) 00:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roofflat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grennman,

Could I kindly ask to review my draft.

Regards,

Visar Roofflat (talk) 00:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed an article. Kindly ask to accept it. Roofflat (talk) 00:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Grennman, I reviewed an article. Kindly ask to review it. Roofflat (talk) 08:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visar Kastrati (May 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aplucas0703 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Visar Kastrati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

aaronneallucas (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Visar Kastrati has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Visar Kastrati. Thanks! Oltrepier (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. So, I will remove this citation from the blog. But other sources are reliable enough. Plase review it and leave me any other comment. Thank you. Roofflat (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Oltrepier,

I did the changes you proposed. Hope you are going to review again and leave me any further comment.

Regards,

Visar Roofflat (talk) 13:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visar Kastrati has been accepted[edit]

Visar Kastrati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Oltrepier (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help Roofflat (talk) 10:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and sorry for reading this message just now!

I'll also address that you've got time until 25 May to nominate the article for the Did you know? section, should you wish to do so: make sure to read their guidelines, though! Oltrepier (talk) 08:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]