User talk:Rudra Simha

Welcome!

Hi Rudra Simha! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 12:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yadu (legendary king), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 12:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Battle of Kasahrada. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 16:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajputs in Gujarat, you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Asian Social Groups

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced info

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Conquest of Sindan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Violetmyers ^(Talk) 13:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gujara-pratihara dynasty was a Rajput Dynasty why are you reverting my edit. You aren't even a administrator to warn me Rudra Simha (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The origin of the dynasty is disputed and putting Rajput victory without giving a source is not a good idea.Violetmyers ^(Talk) 16:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gurjara was a regional identity every historian believes it. Modern day Gujjars have nothing to do with pratihars, and pratihar is a Rajput clan Rudra Simha (talk) 02:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pls stop putting ur POV. Origin is still disputed among historians + the sources nowhere says that it was a Rajput victory and I'm going for a deletion of that Article in future.Violetmyers ^(Talk) 04:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dogra conquest of Gilgits

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Dogra conquest of Gilgits, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 03:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dogra conquest of Gilgit

Hello, Rudra Simha,

Thank you for creating Dogra conquest of Gilgit.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please link the article to other relevant pages and replace obsolete sources such as Leitner, Gottlieb Wilhelm (1877) amd Drew, Frederic (1875) with modern sources, thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ratnahastin}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rathore conquest of Jangladesh has been accepted

Rathore conquest of Jangladesh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:R2dra per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/R2dra. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]