User talk:SG1994!

SG1994!, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SG1994!! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shōnen manga, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not changed sourced content on an article or add content that is not directly sourced. —Farix (t | c) 21:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shōnen manga, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 21:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Farix (t | c) 21:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Shōnen manga. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Farix (t | c) 21:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 21:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but there are a substantial amount of sites that say it’s for 12 to 18 years of age. Deb Aoki is the only person to claim that but she has no evidence to support that. She is merely assuming that’s the age range when there is no consistency to that and while Kodomo-muke (for children) is the only confirmed manga demographic that age range fits in. While most sources say that Shonen is for boys ages 12 to 18. In fact most agree it’s for teen boys. Some say tween to teen boys but tween refers to 12. You want multiple sources then here I will provide them for you. And once you read all these please consider adding these to the references and change the age range of the Shonen demographic on the page. Thank you. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShonenDemographic?from=Main.Shonen

https://nihonmangaworld.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/shonen-jump/

https://allthetropes.org/w/index.php?title=Shōnen_manga&useformat=mobile#

https://books.google.com/books?id=E03KBgAAQBAJ&q=Teenage+readers#v=snippet&q=Shonen&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=uY8700WJy_gC&pg=PA1&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=snippet&q=Twelve%20&f=false

https://geekandsundry.com/an-introduction-to-manga/

http://manga.yoexpert.com/types-of-manga-10465/what-are-the-different-types-of-manga-43730.html

http://www.hxchector.com/anime-and-manga-types/

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shōnen_(media)

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=manga

https://bookriot.com/2019/01/30/guide-to-manga/

https://m.wikihow.com/Get-Into-Manga

https://reelrundown.com/animation/animanga_genres

http://guides.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/c.php?g=288313&p=1922706

https://anigamers.com/2009/08/otakon-09-shonen-manga-history-of.html

https://animanga.fandom.com/wiki/Shōnen

https://www.nypl.org/blog/2018/12/27/beginners-guide-manga

February 2021

Your recent editing history at Misato Katsuragi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Misato Katsuragi) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Izno (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Morgan695 (talk) 22:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You’re not an admin so you don’t have such authority. SG1994! (talk) 22:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Morgan695 (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don’t get to dictate what is reliable or not. Those two links https://thewordcounter.com/meaning-of-shounen/

https://japanesetactics.com/what-does-shounen-mean-in-anime We deemed reliable and have been for a few years. You don’t have any authority to deem them not. SG1994! (talk) 04:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Morgan695 (talk) 05:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abusing the system to win an argument that you’re clearly proven wrong in? Wow. 😂 SG1994! (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? We finally came to an understanding and compromise. You can’t block me and accuse violations after that. SG1994! (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan965 and I agreed to a term. You can’t block me for this. SG1994! (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I demand a repeal. SG1994! (talk) 20:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan and I made a productive contribution agreement. So the block isn’t necessary. SG1994! (talk) 20:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]