User talk:Sadequain Foundation USA

This is Sadequain Foundation USA's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadequain Foundation USA (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sadequain Foundation USA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sadequain Foundation USA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am just creating a Wikipedia page for a non-profit organization. Why Wikipedia is declined my draft. Additionally, also blocked my IP address for advertising or promoting. Can you help me in this matter Sadequain Foundation USA (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sadequain Foundation USA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sadequain Foundation USA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sadequain Foundation USA/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sadequain Foundation USA/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 18:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen328 (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sadequain Foundation USA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Truewriter68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Recently I got a block due to my username. I will never use this username again. I've created for writing an article with exact named this username. So kindly approve my username change request. Hope you will understand my reason. I'll be thanksful.

Decline reason:

Your username is only one small aspect of the block. You need to speak to your deeply inappropriate edits that violated WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and possibly WP:PAID- telling us what edits you will make instead now that you know you won't be permitted to, in the short term, edit about your organization. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear,

I am new to Wikipedia. Kindly tell me whole process that how could I will edit my about information. I have wasted a lot of my time. If you have your whatsapp kindly let me get your phone number. Thanks. Sadequain Foundation USA (talk) 07:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment)

You need to read and understand the reasons given when your unblock request was declined back in March (see above). If you wish to appeal your block again, you must address these reasons directly. Specifically, note that you were not only blocked because of your user name, but because of your promotional editing and conflict-of-interest.

You must also format your appeal as instructed above, for it to appear on the administrators' feed; otherwise no one may see your appeal (I did, as I happen to be watching your talk page because I created it, but for all I know I may be the only one!).

Additionally, you must not create any more user accounts. This is important, because each time you do that (and I'm not saying you have done, since the ones created back in Feb/Mar), you erode the chances of a successful unblock.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]