User talk:Sajay the future of india

hai

April 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drishyam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Diffs: [1][2][3][4] Improper removal of sourced content. Editing with POV, edit warring. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sajay the future of india, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Sajay the future of india! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Drishyam. In these edits you appear to re-remove sourced content in a manner similar to the way Anjaan333, a currently blocked, and disruptive user who engaged in edit-warring, edited. Here is your option: Go to the article's talk page and explain why the content, as currently presented, is disagreeable to you. If you can't adequately discuss or support your edits, they will be reverted, and you will likely be reported to WP:SPI for investigation. Wikipedia relies on the bold, revert, discuss cycle for articles to evolve, but if you revert with no intention of discussing, it runs contrary to community expectations, your edits will be deemed disruptive, and permanent blocks may be sought. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]