User talk:Sandeep sharma chotia 29DWD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sandeep sharma chotia 29DWD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 29DWD, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 29DWD[edit]

The article 29DWD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, fails general notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drm310 (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chak 29 D. W. D.[edit]

You have undone several editors' efforts to clean up the Chak 29 D. W. D. page. Please stop using Wikipedia as a means for promoting yourself. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Full form of computer[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Full form of computer. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Computer#Etymology. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Computer#Etymology – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --Richard Yin (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sandeep sharma chotia 29DWD. You have new messages at Gene93k's talk page.
Message added 17:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Chak 29 D. W. D. - again[edit]

If you want to add information to the Chak 29 D. W. D. article, please do so within the current structure of the article and please be sure to cite reliable sources for all your contributions to Wikipedia. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chak 29 D. W. D. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chak 29 D. W. D. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chak 29 D. W. D. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bromley86 (talk) 21:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page ईच्छापूर्ण बालाजी मंदिर to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]