User talk:Sanguinity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Sanguinity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 12:53, 8 August 2005 (UTC)


It looks fine now, many thanks.--Cúchullain t/c 23:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


Answered in my talk page. Mukadderat 02:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Working Man's Barnstar[edit]

Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Man's Barnstar
For your tireless labours in disambiguation link repair in the last few weeks as evidenced by your impressive contribution history: I, BigNate37(T), present Sanguinity with The Working Man's Barnstar! 02:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request[edit]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 23:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Core Diambiguation Page[edit]

You marked the core disambiguation page at for cleanup. I cleaned it up and would appreciate it if you gave it a look see, if you could, to see that its up to scratch. Thanks Cpuwhiz11 23:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Mrs Jenkins et al[edit]

Did you mean to put those pages up for AfD or Prod? Not all of them have an AfD header on them, so I'll add it for you now and you can remove it as you see fit. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I meant to put them up, and got tangled up in the AfD templates. I thought I had them sorted out, but if you can fix them better than I, I would be grateful. Sanguinity 21:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

core (anatomy)[edit]

Hi, it was good you removed the core (anatomy) from the disambiguous page, but it was also referred to in a page on functional movement I started today. I was going to write up the article, but I didn't get around to it before it all the core (anatomy) links got removed. boy this wikipedia is fast. I'll write up an article and get things going. Thanks for your attention, Rhetth 21:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

So it is bad form to disambigue a link that is not yet written? Rhetth 22:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Samuel Colt[edit]

Hi, I have been following the discussions and have recently updated the article. I hope this is some help. Jediforce 02:30, 18 November (UTC)

Pearls Before Swine[edit]

I'm curious about your moving Pearls Before Swine to Pearls Before Swine (disambiguation) "per WP style for disambig pages". To my reading, the naming convention in WP:D says that the former (no parentheses) is preferable. What were you referring to? Sanguinity 23:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

That wasn't me. Look at the history more carefully. —Keenan Pepper 23:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest[edit]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)