User talk:Sankardev mission

INDIA’S PREDATE MODERN ANCIENT CLASSICAL PHYSICS

Speedy deletion nomination of Unraveling a mystery of space

Hello Sankardev mission,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Unraveling a mystery of space for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 05:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Unraveling a mystery of space

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Unraveling a mystery of space requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gronk Oz (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Unraveling a mystery of space, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you feel there is a good reason why the article should not be deleted, then follow the links provided to contest the deletion. Do not simply remove the deletion tag again. Gronk Oz (talk) 11:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Background of Ancient classical physics of India

Hi, I'm Catmando999. Sankardev mission, thanks for creating Background of Ancient classical physics of India!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I do not really understand this page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 09:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you because your name gives off the impression that you're here to promote Sankardev, possibly on behalf of an organization. You mention a Sankardeva in the articles you wrote, so I'm not sure if you're part of an organization that wants to promote his findings or not. The articles were also WP:NOT essays so while I've blocked you for a username violation, I do want to make sure that you are aware that you cannot post essay-like articles to Wikipedia per WP:NOTESSAY and that you must use reliable sources in your articles, otherwise they will be seen as original research. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:New00 lord krishna.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:New00 lord krishna.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]