User talk:Sarojupreti132

Welcome!

Hi, Sarojupreti132. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Thomas.W ^talk 13:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adaa Khan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 13:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see What Wikipedia is not for further details). Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 13:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social-networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction; also, you should read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references to external links

Please stop adding references to external links, as you have been doing at Shree Harikul. The links are already listed, and there's nothing to be gained from adding references to them. The article generally does need some inline citations, but these need to be to reliable sources (not Facebook and Twitter) and added to the relevant sentences within the article's text -- not to the external link section. Thanks. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 10:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded images

I have marked the three images you are trying to add to the article Shree Harikul for deletion. They are unsourced, and of a very low resolution - I suspect that they have been copied from some website. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The images are:

File:ShreeHarikul1.jpeg

File:ShreeHarikulAF2072.jpeg

File:ShreeHarikul.jpeg

Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oasis Academy School

Hello Sarojupreti132,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Oasis Academy School for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rollingcontributor (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for account Unblock

Hi, I'd notice that my account had been blocked by user:Bbb29. I want 2 recover my account from blocking list. Somebody please help me.

To appeal against a block, you need to follow the process at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. If you don't follow the process there, it's incredibly unlikely anyone with the power to unblock you will see your request to be unblocked. —me_and 11:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you've made another attempt to request being unblocked, but you haven't followed the instructions at the link I gave above, which means no admin will see the request. You also haven't explained why you think the block was wrong; no admin will unblock you unless they can see why you shouldn't have been blocked in the first place or see evidence that you're not going to repeat whatever it was that caused you to be blocked. —me_and 13:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reason you are blocked is because you appear to have multiple accounts which you are using for illegitimate purposes. If you want to be unblocked, you'll need to show you understand why that's a problem and show evidence you won't use multiple accounts in future. And you still haven't used the {{unblock}} template to request the unblock, which means no administrator will see the request. —me_and 14:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request For Unblock My Account.

Introduction

Hi, I am Saroj Upreti. My account has been blocked and i want to unblock my account.

Reason for unblocking my account

I want to edit many page and i want to be the nice editor. So please give one chance for me.

Request

About Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks.

I'd read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks but i didn't know how to unblock my account..

WHY I'D BEEN BLOCKED FROM WIKIPEDIA

Due to some misbehaves on article named Shree harikul model higher secondary school and creating new article named Oasis Academy School i'd been blocked from wikipedia.

WHY I SHOULD BE UNBLOCKED FROM WIKIPEDIA

With Respect i state that i'd done some mistakes in wikipedia and i want to prove myself by doing good works and i want to create more articles in wikipedia. So please unblock me from wikipedia

Speedy deletion nomination of Jhiljhile

A tag has been placed on Jhiljhile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oasis Academy School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oasis Academy School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oasis Academy School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —me_and 18:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarojupreti132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because i want to edit some more articles which aren't improved and i want to be the nice editor.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Last Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarojupreti132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd realized my mistakes that i'd edited article unnecessary. So please give me one chance to improve myself. I will edited the article which are necessary.

Decline reason:

This is a "checkuser" block, which means you are blocked for misuse of multiple accounts (and not for "edited article unnecessary"). You will need to address that if you want to have any chance of being unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.