User talk:Sassy Sylvia

Welcome

Hello, Sassy Sylvia, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 01:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI on section headings

I thought I'd let you know, on Wikipedia, section headings tend to not be capitalized after the first word unless they contain proper nouns. "Capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus "Rules and regulations", not "Rules and Regulations"." (see MOS:HEAD) --JonRidinger (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI on tables

Table rows are separated by |-. If you remove these, as you did in this edit, you collapse the table to a single row. See Help:Table for help on editing tables. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 17:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

University president cleanup

Clean away, but please be careful NOT to remove information (e.g., dates and places of birth), or to remove Wikipedia formatting. Please be sure to use an edit summary to explain what all of your edits are doing, but be especially careful to do so when removing sourced content. Alansohn (talk) 02:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point

Why do you keep removing the red links from the page? There are 2 options for lists of notable alumni for a university: Option 1) Keep the red links per WP:REDLINK. That implies that the subject is notable enough to have an article, but the article is not written yet. It's our way to show what topics need to be written. By removing the redlinks, you are implying that your opinion is that they are not notable enough to be the subject of an article. Option 2) Remove the person from the list altogether. The person's notability needs to be explained for them to remain on the list. My opinion is that the short explanation for these people has explained their notability.

Please start explaining your actions and reasons for doing what you're doing in edit summaries at the bottom. Then we can see what you're thinking. Please respond back here on your talk page. Feel free to talk with me on my talk page. Any topic is fair game. That's how you learn. We've all been new at some time, and an experienced voice will smooth out this rough period before you truly understand how things work. Let me help you out! Royal broil 11:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding to my comments on your userpage. Sounds good! Royal broil 02:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lester Lefton

Hello! Sorry my reply has taken so long, but I did want to get back to you on the potential COI on the Lester Lefton article. It is my understanding that the University using their own Communications and Marketing department to edit pages is indeed a COI. Kent State University Stark Campus was also guilty of this while Betsy Boze was there and those pages reflect that. Biographies should highlight a person's career and personal life, but it should read as an unbiased article, not a prepared bio that you would find on a resume or on the University's website. Because KSUUCM is preparing and editing this under the KSUUCM name (meaning it's likely being done on University time and on University computers), I have no reason to believe what's here will be any more "neutral" than what they have on the KSU website, which would not only violate COI, but WP:NOT as well since Wikipedia is not a mirror site. As for sources, feel free to tag or even better remove unsourced statements from this or any article. --JonRidinger (talk) 12:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "Minor edit"

Be sure to read WP:ME about using the "minor edit" box at the bottom. A minor edit is something like correcting a spelling mistake and/or a grammar or punctuation error, removing or adding wikilinks, or doing something with the format like moving a picture. In other words, it doesn't change the content of the paragraph, section, or article. You have been using "minor edit" when you have removed entire sentences or even multiple words in several articles. Just because an edit may be small, doesn't mean it is a minor edit. --JonRidinger (talk) 18:30, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]