User talk:SauxyLady

Welcome!

Hello, SauxyLady, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto Cabrera (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

per WP:BLP1E

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberto Cabrera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roberto Cabrera, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SauxyLady! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 03:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at P. K. Yonge Developmental Research School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at User:SauxyLady, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Favonian (talk) 11:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at P. K. Yonge Developmental Research School. Favonian (talk) 16:51, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And for the second time I've had to delete your user page as blatant vandalism. You are one false step away from an indefinite block. Favonian (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 22:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SauxyLady (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was a small altercation between me and Favonian. I was trying to figure out why he persistently deleted my user page. I think that he overreacted in his decision to block me. I will be happy to just leave my user page blank I just need a good reason why. I am sorry if I offended anyone with my actions and I just personally think that there was a small amount of administrative abuse in this situation. And I have also been contributing to wikipedia that past few days. I have made positive edits on Mount & Blade: Warband and I wish to keep doing so. I just need a second chance so please reconsider your decision to block me. SauxyLady (talk) 22:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I took a look at your userpage. I was sorely tempted to revoke your talk page access, as you clearly were trolling and your unblock request honestly just appears to be further trolling. However, I'll give you one more chance to craft a sensible unblock request that addresses the breathtakingly inappropriate edits you were making to your userpage. Yamla (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Having investigated further, you were clearly just trolling. I have revoked your talk page access. I see you've also been blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. --Yamla (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]