User talk:Savoychimp12

December 2019

The city name Rabwah is changed to chnab nager,

Hello, I'm UserDude. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rabwah have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. userdude 06:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ordinance XX, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please do not add opinion of your own, too. You must cite properly published, reliable sources. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rabwah shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rabwah, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:27, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rabwah. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rabwah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:47, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]