User talk:Seelouise58

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Lowell National Historical Park worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Public history

I have nominated Category:Public history (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Buel has been accepted

Jesse Buel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rhumidian (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grocery Manufacturers Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hershey's (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Beckford (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Beckford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm astonished at this decision. The sources cited are in fact published, reliable (i.e. peer-reviewed and/or published within reputable academic locations), and secondary. This scholar was extremely notable within a recognized "school of thought" and seminal in several strands of intellectual tradition, especially in thinking about "plantation theory." Moreover, he is one of a limited number of economists of color to be part of the scholarly "canon." Wikipedia has extensive articles about many of his peers and close colleagues (eg Kari Polanyi Levitt and Lloyd Best) and it makes no sense to omit him. In making this entry, I was trying to add to the representation of important intellectuals of color, and your rejection is troubling for that among other reasons. I'm also a social science PhD myself and well able to assess what's a credible source and a notable contributor to scholarly thought. Please reconsider. Seelouise58 (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seelouise58! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Beckford

Hello, Seelouise58. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Beckford, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Beckford

Hello, Seelouise58. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "George Beckford".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:47, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]