User talk:Senator Begs-Ducks-For-Bread

July 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Evangelism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dolotta (talk) 07:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Still new to some of the rules. I thought the pictures applied and that they would make things cheerier, but I guess that isn't very encycolpedic.Senator Begs-Ducks-For-Bread (talk) 07:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 07:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments. Dolotta (talk) 16:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I thought since it was my talk page I could do whatever, but I didn't mean to break any rules. And, just to be clear, I intended my edit as a way of poking fun at myself, not as a putdown towards anyone else. Senator Begs-Ducks-For-Bread (talk) 05:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the ollowing text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 17:23, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Senator Begs-Ducks-For-Bread (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked in a group with a lot of other new users, but my only association with them was that I was welcoming them on their talk pages. I don't think the user who blocked me examined me carefully, I think this person just lumped me in with other problematic editors. In fact, I had actually spent some time reverting the work of a few of these people when they made obvious attempts at vandalism. I have made some poor choices, such as making silly comments, but I am still learning and I think you can see from my history that I have put in some positive effort. At the very least, I don't think I should have been indefinitely banned as a first-time punishment. Senator Begs-Ducks-For-Bread (talk) 02:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've examined a few of your edits at random, and all I saw was blatant vandalism. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment from blocking admin. Certainly I examined you carefully. I did see you revert vandalism on a few occasions — thank you — notably at Treasure Island, so technically "vandalism-only" is not right. But that's not nearly enough to make up for all your own unconstructive edits. You weren't blocked "along with" other new editors in any significant sense. It's a sad fact that many new users are blocked, since there tend to be a lot of drive-by vandals and advertising accounts among them. They're all blocked for their own reasons, and my own blocks are mostly for using Wikipedia to advertise. Bishonen | talk 09:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Okay, I just looked at Bishonen's page and I think he might be on drugs. There's a little girl being scorched by godzilla's atomic breath, some creepy pervert eyes just floating around, and all kinds of other weird stuff. Is he really the kind of person whose judgement we can trust? I mean, I wouldn't be surprised to find out he sleeps with an anime body pillow Senator Begs-Ducks-For-Bread (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. Go troll somewhere else. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]