User talk:Serols/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Serols. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Poreyahat

It's is small town in santhal Pargana and Poraiyahat is another name of Poreyahat Aayush42 (talk) 07:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello Aayush42, please don´t delete the info-box. --Serols (talk) 07:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Poraiyahat

It's is a Education Centre In East region Of Jharkhand and POREYAHAT and Poraiyahat is same and one place in Godda and also known as educational centre in Santhal Pargana Division in Jharkhand State . Aayush42 (talk) 07:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Cinema of China

I've reverted a vandalism and got reverted instead. Now that's something new! Notice my edit restores the d to the dgeneration. Please read the section before revert. Thanks. ∼∼∼∼ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.15.140.193 (talk) 00:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello 116.15.140.193, please use the "Show preview" before you save, this was wrong. --Serols (talk) 07:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry about

reverting you... Hit rollback by mistake. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Reverting Edits

Excuse me, I have made a contribution to the Antonio Salieri Wikipedia page 18:09, August 18. I had no intention to vandalize, I genuinely wanted to add some information. For some time it stayed up but it was reverted seemingly out of the blue. I didn't get notified so I don't understand who reverted it or why it was reverted but I was hoping that you could offer some information or advice. Perhaps I'm just a naïve and the answer should be obvious but I'm very new to Wikipedia and have yet to learn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Date Mothman (talk • contribs) 02:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

@Date Mothman:, your edits were reverted because you kept trying to claim that Mozart was gay without giving any reliable sources to demonstrate that your edits were not merely your own personal opinions.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Mr Fink, I didn't claim Mozart was gay. I didn't even claim Salieri was gay. I wrote "As a side note, sexuality-wise, it would be unfair to assume that he is heterosexual as in Dwight's Journal of Music he said, speaking about the reviews of his first opera, "...'It pleased me right well,' said a second. (That man I could have kissed)." The possibility that he considered kissing a man, while not solid confirmation, is enough to make one consider that he is not heterosexual.".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Date Mothman (talk • contribs)

That sort of deliberately ambiguous wording is weasel wording, and does not improve or belong in Wikipedia.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Xujiahui

Hi Serols, thank you for reverting my modification. It seems that my translation to Italian changed the original page in English, correct? If so I wonder what went wrong since I followed the same approach I already used for some previous translations..

Dan

Dragon (disambiguation)

Kingsschoolhampshire (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)i was trying to tell others that the page was not an artical as our school are doing a dragon project and many were confused.hope you understand.thanks! ps please respondKingsschoolhampshire (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	thanks for solving peacefully my mistake without banning me as im new to wiki.(used it for school) Kingsschoolhampshire (talk) 17:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Bubble tea is a tea or juice beverage containing small chewy balls made of tapioca starch or jelly. First invented in Taiwan, it is now popular inn many areas of the world. Kingsschoolhampshire (talk) 18:00, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Defender (1981 video game)

Hello Amy is cool, may be, but read here - prototype 1980 - released 1981. --Serols (talk) 11:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Chatting

Can Wikipedia be used as a way of free general chat between people? Has that been done before? Daniel Rielly (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Daniel Rielly, Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia not a chat, but see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

CREDAI article

Please remove the copyright tag from the article as well as the copied content (assuming I am not authorised to do so). I intent to improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.66.132.179 (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello 106.66.132.179, please use the talk-page, before you delete. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Apator Toruń

Hello. The information that the club returned to its historic name Apator is not truth. Qvaxy (talk) 11:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Qvaxy, sorry, but this is the article-name. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Last time the club have used name Apator in 2005. Qvaxy (talk) 11:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Qvaxy, please use the talk-page. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

CREATE A USER PAGE!

Create your user page! It is easy! add your information and get started so that people can know about you!Arepticous (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Weblinks

I noticed that you used Wikipedia:Weblinks to in explaining this edit. To say nothing of the merit of BarryJenkins1's edit, the only link in it was that within in reference he used, yet WP:Weblinks states "this guideline does not apply to inline citations or general references", and therefore not to the situation in which you used it. Sjrct (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Sjrct, the user made only eight differnt edits with the same link. Your example was the last edit which I deleted. In my opinion is this link-spam. What do you mean? Regards--Serols (talk) 17:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Do not abuse

Regarding: Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kamikaze. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not make unsubstantiated accusations and threats. If you are not familiar with WP:MOS please take some time to read.

-- MC 141.131.2.3 (talk) 17:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello 141.131.2.3, please excuse my mistake, I am really sorry. Also the warning was not ok. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

I agree that the bold should go, but this warning is ridiculous. Drmies (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Julia Taylor Ross

Hi there -

Yes it is a mistake - Julia Taylor Ross' birthday is NOT correct. Also she now goes by Julia Chan as you will see from IMDB.

How do we change her name to Julia Chan (AKA Julia Taylor Ross)??

Hello Lovelyattire 1, I think this is not right - see here 1, 2, 3. Also her bithdate is obviously April 14, 1983. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Serols - The birthday is definitely incorrect. If you look at IMDB you will see she now is credited as Julia CHAN not Taylor Ross, can we change it to ("also known professionally as JULIA TAYLOR ROSS") Thanks for your help.

Hello Lovelyattire 1, IMDB is the only site in the top 100 on Google with Julia Chan, the rest with Taylor Ross. You can write your concerns on the talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Podcasts

Thank you for you response about no blogs. If I change the links directly to the Podcast page, as opposed to the Blog page would that be acceptable?

Mtroy (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)mtroy

Hello Mtroy, sorry, no - you have been blocked because of these links. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

about the updates in Savola page

thank you for your comments.

but I am trying to update the company page to align with the website but it got rejected many times. I've contacted edit team to get the needed privilege but no use.

Hello ShahadAlghamdi, please read at first Wikipedia:Writing better articles and Wikipedia:Weblinks, use uppercase and lowercase and references. --Serols (talk) 07:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Lord Ram

Lord Ram which is refered as 'राम' in devnagari (Hindi and Sanskrit) is the correct name Why should we call him Rama? The name should not be modify in such a way that it lost it true pronunciation and meaning. Who are Bharata, Lakshmana? they are actually called Bharat and Lakshman. Why there is always 'a' which is not at all required in each vedic name

Hello Tailor jigyasu 12345, the article name is Rama, not Ram. --Serols (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Do you know the true/actual name referred in the old text, and do you know Sanskrit??

Hello Tailor jigyasu 12345,please accept the aricle name. --Serols (talk) 11:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Serols With all respect, I just want to convey, the article name itself leads to wrong information, The purpose of Wikipedia is not to spread the wrong information. If article name has ambiguity, it does not mean that we need to follow same thing for entire article. Why I am doing this changes because I belongs to the community where the God Ram is our deity and we know how to call their name, we don't want to disrespect his name. And also help me to edit article name too.

Hello Tailor jigyasu 12345, is this ok for you: Rama or Ram (/ˈrɑːmə/;[2] Sanskrit: राम, IAST: Rāma), also known as Ramachandra, .....--Serols (talk) 12:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Serols Sounds ok, Thanks

Hello Tailor jigyasu 12345, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Editing posts

"Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pigs in blankets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)"

I added the alternative name of these, Kilted Sausages, as they are known in Scotland, this is not vandalism, this is correcting an inaccuracy in the article.

~~DrGonzo11~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrGonzo11 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello DrGonzo11, you created a html-mistake with your edit, so I deletet your edit - see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

a html error that I went back and corrected, during which time you sent a message accusing me of vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrGonzo11 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello DrGonzo11, unfortunately many make this mistake intentionally to destroy the page view. Not by you - sorry for the warning. --Serols (talk) 17:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Scarlet Diva

You claim that the link I added "didn't appear to be constructive". You are obviously wrong, as you would find if you actually (1) clicked on the link and (2) observed who the author of the linked text is. I have reverted.

I ask you to consider things more carefully in the future. Additionally, you should not classify such edits as minor. 86.168.144.113 (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello 86.168.144.113, no social-links - see Wikipedia:Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining more. That guidelines states this: "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid providing external links to ... Twitter feeds". That says it is a guideline, using the term "generally". Thus, it is not a rigid policy.

The Wikipedia article is about a movie that is written and directed by Asia Argento. The movie includes a scene where Argento's character is sexually assaulted by a man similar to Harvey Weinstein. Argento has a blue-check Twitter account. Using that account, she sent out a tweet of the first part of the scene. The link that I put in was for her tweet.

I have now put the link back in, but in a different way: as a second reference, for the paragraph that discusses the scene. See what you think. 86.167.140.159 (talk) 18:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello 86.168.144.113, now is your edit perfect - thank you. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Much glad that you like it and that we worked this out! Kind thanks, 86.167.140.159 (talk) 18:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Finding Gobi edits

I would ask you to listen to the interviews that I have posted and they are very informative and add a lot to the subject

The interview with Dion Leonard is the runner who found Gobi. The interview includes information that is not found anywhere else. I recieved no compensation for that or any of my interviews

Please respond, as I am new to Wiki and am really trying to enhance the topics

I would ask you to listen to the interviews that I have posted and they are very informative and add a lot to the subject

The interview with Dion Leonard is the runner who found Gobi. The interview includes information that is not found anywhere else. I recieved no compensation for that or any of my interviews

Please respond, as I am new to Wiki and am really trying to enhance the topics

Also, you reverted a number of my edits. If you listen to just a few moments of the interviews, you will be able to determine that they are not destructive posts.

Can you please review your work and give me a path for me to follow to post these interviews

Hello MarkRybczyk, what you do is link-spam. Regards--Serols (talk) 17:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello Serols I am still confused. The link went to an interview with the Wiki subject. I am not clear how that is Spam. Please be more specific. I am not trying to be destructive or cause problems, but your actions are about to get me banned from Wikipedia because another user is assuming I am posting Spam. All the links are for interviews with the Wiki Subject. They all include first person information that is not otherwise listed in the Wiki page. I also followed COI protocol.

 I am not clear on the reason for your actions because a quick check of the link would be all it takes to indicate it is not Spam

MarkRybczyk (talk) 22:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello MarkRybczyk, since May you get warnings because of your links. This is definitely the last warning. --Serols (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Page Checklist

Hello,

A couple of days ago I noticed that someone removed the checklist link from the Checklist page. This came from an IP address. I thought this was spam so I undid the change. For some reason, I got caught up in this back and forth thinking that user was using different IP addresses and just removing my fix. I tried to contact you but every time my message to you was deleted. It seemed to me that the whole way in which Wikipedia works is not open as a link that has been there for years gets removed and the UNDO gets marked as spam. That's the opposite of how it should work.

Can you please explain to me why you think that the link to checklist.com is spam? It is a link to a website that is highly relevant and sheds more light on different checklist examples. I don't see what is wrong with it other than it being commercial. But reading the wikipedia guide, it says that that is not a problem as long as it adds value. Which in my opinion it does.

I look forward to your response.

Hello, the page is not conform with Wikipedia:Weblinks and what you have done is linkspam and edit-war. --Serols (talk) 14:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

I have read that document and I believe it is fine. What is exactly not conform with? I don't believe it is spam and hence my question to you.

Apparently not accurate - Wikipedia:Weblinks -> 6 - your site has no value for Wikipedia. Please read also External link spamming. Also interesting for you: MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Serols (talk) 07:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Checklist.com is a site about checklists. It provides numerous examples of checklists that the Wikipedia reader can benefit from to further understand checklists and how to use them. I see a direct value here to readers. If you take this approach of "no value" then no links are of any value to wikipedia readers. This is clearly not the case. In addition, this link was there for years until someone removed it and now you claim I am the spammer. BTW - It is not MY site. I am just a user. You refer to point 6 which say: "Sites that require payment or registration" but Checklist.com does not require neither to view the checklists — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.129.89.25 (talk) 14:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.129.89.25 (talk) 13:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Everything has been said, the discussion is finished. --Serols (talk) 16:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

I am asking for an explanation? Why are you not answering? You just refer to a point which has nothing to do with the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.129.89.25 (talk) 21:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.129.89.25 (talk) 10:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Tommi Huhtala

Thanks for the message concernig above mentioned page. I am not familiar with these things in Wikipedia but I hope I am in a correct place (talk?). 1. I have not done the edit you mention. Some idiot has been there. 2. I do have a proper identity in Wikipedia and I have done a couple of corrections there. 3. Before the identity I also made some corrections and those, I believe, are on some IP-address. 4. My present IP-address and the one you have are the same. My service provider makes the addresses. That's all I can tell about this.

Thanks saukko2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.76.66.180 (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

April O'Neil

You also put double 2012 animated series headings so I don't understand. The second heading is supposed to be 2003 animated series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:84:4580:5203:6CA6:4EB8:7662:EA85 (talk) 14:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello 2601:84:4580:5203:6CA6:4EB8:7662:EA85, please note the different text. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)