Jump to content

User talk:ShariqIqbalExxgro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2021[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Digital transformation, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 02:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ShariqIqbalExxgro, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi ShariqIqbalExxgro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Exxgro[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Exxgro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 04:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShariqIqbalExxgro (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I just started adding information about a company and got blocked. I would like to share information on management methods which will enhance encyclopedia but I see the reason of blocking as clearly not here to build the encyclopedia. Not sure if I understand the logic. This is valuable knowledge that I would like to share. Please consider a perspective. I am okay if any edits are needed. Blocking action happened too fast without even listening to my perspective

Decline reason:

This doesn't address whether you've been paid to edit Wikipedia, nor whether you have some connection to the organization that you were writing about. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.