User talk:Sheroddy
August 2015
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Adam Smith has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Adam Smith was changed by Sheroddy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861327 on 2015-08-16T14:26:55+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Your speedy deletion tags
[edit]I would suggest that you read WP:CSD#A7. Notability at CSD only comes into A9, which is rather a special case. Speedy deletion for 'questionable notability' is not valid, and you seem to be picking some people to tag rather unnecessarily. When I saw Edina Ronay on the list, my first thought was "What the hell?". I take very little interest in models, actresses and fashion designers, but even I knew that name straight away. Some of the older articles on Wikipedia are not referenced as well as more recent ones, but the requirements then were lower. This is no reason to tag for speedy deletion. If you are querying notability, WP:AFD is the place for that, not CSD. Peridon (talk) 16:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. I shall read the guidelines. And you are right in the fact that the article about Edina Ronay is older and therefore is less well-sourced.--Sheroddy (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Sheroddy, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Sheroddy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
Tagging of Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa
[edit]I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa. I do not think that Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "Not notable and clearly made by somebody close to the subject or the subject itself. No sources on the internet about the subject except for its own personal or professional pages" is not a valid speedy deletion reason. This clearly makes a claim of significence so it is not subject to A7. Sources need not be online. COI editing is not grounds for deletion. The article is not blatantly promotional. Take it to AfD if you choose.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I removed the AFD tag you placed on this article, because it linked to the previous AFD that was closed as Keep in June 2015. You didn't seem to post a rationale on the talk page, or create a second debate and post a rationale there, so there was no link to correct. Please feel free to re-nominate the article and complete the steps for a second nomination - though a recent AFD in June might make it harder to find consensus for deletion. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
hello, please read WP:BEFORE before you nominate more articles for deletion. When you nominate clearly notable subjects for deletion such as your nomination of Tzaims Luksus, you are wasting the time of those who contribute to AfD's. You need to do a genuine search for sources and compare those sources to the criteria at WP:GNG. Since your stats for AfD nomination are only 60% successful, it's clear that you would benefit from doing some research before nominating articles so quickly for deletion. Thank you, New Media Theorist (talk) 19:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)