User talk:Shivan20

October 2014

Hello, I'm Technopat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2011–12 UEFA Champions League knockout phase because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Technopat (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yo Yo Honey Singh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Reticulated Spline ^{(t • c)} 10:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 19:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Ileana D'Cruz

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Ileana D'Cruz article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Mediavalia ^talk 16:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot "let you edit Ileana D'Cruz" - it has been protected from editing because new editors inappropriately spam the article with inappropriate content, and only an administrator can change the level back or give you the access level to edit yourself. However, no administrator is going to bump up your access level because your edits are precisely the type of fanboy fluffery that the article was protected to guard against. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Charmy Kaur has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Charmy Kaur was changed by Shivan20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950528 on 2015-01-10T13:44:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charmy Kaur. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.Onel5969 (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mr.Z-man 16:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]