User talk:Simon crab
License tagging for Image:Milesmiles.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Milesmiles.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
?[edit]
you dont happen to have any unreleased muslimgauze tucked away somewhere do you? --AlexOvShaolin 01:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Space studios[edit]
A tag has been placed on Space studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DFS454 (talk) 17:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
The article Recloose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP ONLY claim to any form of notability is one of inheritance through founding person and bands that may or may not be signed (No Ref's).
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 17:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Recloose[edit]
I have nominated Recloose, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recloose. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 10:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Recloose, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recloose until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Suddendep.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Suddendep.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
"120 Years of Electronic Music"[edit]
Hi. I am concerned about your addition of what appears to be your own website on various musical instrument articles including Hammond organ ([1]), Mellotron ([2]), RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer ([3]) and Ondes Martenot ([4]). I don't mind people adding external links to sites that contain information above and beyond what we can include in Wikipedia articles, but I'd advise you to read our guidelines for placing external links.
I don't mind including the Hammond organ link as it includes the original patent diagrams, but I am concerned about the factual accuracy of the accompanying text. Especially, I would dispute the claim that "The Hammond Organ became popular with Jazz, Blues and Rock musicians up until the late 1960′s" - as our article states (and backed up by sources) that it remained popular into the 1970s and experienced a renaissance in the 2000s to the extent that Joey DeFrancesco thinks it's "bigger than ever".
An accompanying issue is that if you continue add external links to your own website, somebody is likely to conclude you have a conflict of interest and start reverting them. It hasn't happened yet, and I will try and defend what I can, but I fear it is only a matter of time before somebody does.
I hope that clarifies things. If not, please let me know. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:01, 21 November 2014 (UTC)