User talk:Sirmob

Hello, fellow Tiger! - Brian Kendig 21:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Could you please revisit Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Finnish Socialist Workers' Republic? The article has been rewritten and I don't want it deleted unnecessarily. AndyL 4 July 2005 05:33 (UTC)

Re:Lohman

Sadly that figures. This is probably a lost cause considering the stack of votes already compiled. Nice to meet you too.

Regards, lots of issues | leave me a message 7 July 2005 06:26 (UTC)

Sandbox - word association

Hey there! I fixed up the sandbox, and a new game has just started. This time, we're gonna make sure that the links stay tasteful and not degenerate into a rather distasteful collection like last time. I added a little blurb at the top to hopefully minimize/prevent this. Feel free to join in if you like! --HappyCamper 22:31, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User page reversions

No problem, anytime :-) --HappyCamper 10:46, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page needs less Image:Cowbell2.gif

You have the image Image:Cowbell2.gif on your user page; this image is copyrighted and used in the Will Ferrell article under Wikipedia:Fair use. The use on your user page of that image is unlikely to be covered by use however, and as such is probably a Copyright violation. Could you remove the image from your user page? Thanks. --fvw * 23:20, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Banks

I just googled it. If he died, it was within several minutes. I'll be watching. Thanks, αChimp ^laudare 04:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maximillion

Thank you, I was unaware of how to do this. --Ionius Mundus 02:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Downfall Guy

You may want to report "Downfall Guy" to an administrator ASAP. He's an obvious sock of banned user "Mascot Guy." Thought you should know. 71.102.76.166 06:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your question on my talk page

It is a bit difficult to explain. Words are the source of misunderstandings, and the best understanding is made by yourself - it does not matter it is the correct understanding or a false one. So for your good I'll leave your question unanswered. Good luck. Aran heru nar 16:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Princeton University rewrite

I'm in the process of moving myself. Perhaps, we might have to hold this off for a week or two longer. —ExplorerCDT 17:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I do agree with you wholeheartedly on the neologisms. Those, if kept at all, should be put on a "List of neologisms related to Princeton University" or something. Class of '05, you and I might know some of the same people between '01-'06. E-mail me sometime at cdthieme@gmail.com, or AIM: ExplorerCDT. Regards, —ExplorerCDT 17:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating more work

Why you would remove ALL of my edits is assinine. You should have only removed the ones that you had reason to. Doctor Octagon 02:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. Pay careful attention in the future. Lots of people over-react here. It's like this one article I wrote in earlier, someone called it 'hearsay' as if this was a court of law or something. Cheers! Doctor Octagon 02:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on PWU

Just wanted to say I appreciate your work on PWU, and I appreciate your decision to take a break from it until Brad (or someone else) further clarifies what was wrong. My guess, looking over the page, was not that anything was unsourced or libelous, but that the article as a whole was unbalanced, spending too much text on the negatives. I intend to re-add as much of what was there as I can, while being very careful to maintain a balance of positive and negative text. I do hope somebody else shows up, because working alone makes it hard for me to tell if I'm going off on a wrong track. In any case, thanks! JesseW, the juggling janitor 20:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Help Request

I am trying to request arbitration in a new edit war, but am confused by all the steps needed... The article is Khalistan. Any help would be appreciated! Stealthound 20:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Western University

Sirmob, you've expressed an interest in this article before -- can you take a look at Talk:Pacific Western University#This article is stuck as a stub -- I need your help and leave a note as to whether you think the proposed draft is acceptable as a replacement for the existing stub?

Thanks,

--A. B. 17:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. 'Ray 'ray 'ray .. Tiger, tiger, tiger .. Sis, sis, sis .. Boom, boom, boom, ah!

Ed Felten

Hmm, I didn't realize that I had put my edit summary in all caps. I used the summary 'rv vandal' because usually page blanking for no reason is called vandalism. T REX_speak 15:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About 3RR

Don't worry, reverting vandalism[1] doesn't count towards 3RR. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eating clubs

I find this edit hilarious. Someone's taking wikiality too seriously. dcandeto (talk) 03:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP is a school

You recently posted a warning on the user page for IP:216.162.85.209 and I wanted to let you know that it's a school and the issues are most likely just meddling students. I encourage you to block edits from this address for unregistered users to prevent vandalism. --216.162.85.209 (talk) 14:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Dowd

I undeleted this previously PROD'd article; now it's up to you to integrate some references and bring it up to date to reflect his candidacy for mayor, or someone will probably delete it again. :) — brighterorange (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Allman

This article has been deleted once already. Can you please expedite deletion? 75.179.141.9 (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sirmob. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]