User talk:Skype565

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Skype565 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I am sorry for what I have done I have learned I will not create a new article or If I do I will do it in my sandbox first and will ask an adminster to have a look at it to sea which bit Its needs to improve and which bit to add please unblock me I won't do it agin and can you unblock google6666 because I have learned a lesson with that account to please unblock me and that account that my old account

Decline reason:

You've been abusing multiple accounts, which is prohibited, but you think you can get both accounts unblocked? That just reinforces what Kudpung said below, and is further evidence that you do not possess sufficient competence to work here right now. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

comment[edit]

Unfortunately Skype, although you may have thought you were contributing in good faith, you've hardly made any constructive edits to this encyclopedia, and you have refused to take notice of the warnings - see the huge number of your deleted creations. I do not think you are competent enough to come back for at least a year. That will give you time to think about your sockpuppetry, block evasion, and disruptive editing. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Skype565 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

please unblock me please i was making good comntribution but your saying i havent you have to tell me what i have done first what bad contribution have i made

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked if you don't understand why you were blocked in the first place. Please read this policy - you are only allowed to use one account. You were using at least two. Furthermore, your edits were not terribly helpful in the first place. Pick one of your accounts that you wish to use from this point forward and request to have that one unblocked only, once you have reviewed that policy and your edits and understand why these blocks were placed. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Skype565 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

please unblock i do understand why i was block and i am not using two account i have two but that is my old account i dointuse that one anymore please unblock me

Decline reason:

Enough. Even after pointed at the policy you either can't be bothered to read it, or are unable to understand it. I've withdawn your right to edit this page, you still may appeal via WP:UTRS however per the standard practice, you can be unblocked within 6 months from now, if you avoid editing Wikipedia with any account or IP from now on. Max Semenik (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Attacking administrators by email[edit]

1. The WP:DUCKTEST is an officialy used term to describe a set of circumstances where sockpuppetry is in clear evidence without needing a Checkuser or extensive discussion at WP:SPI.

2 Your use of Wikipedia email: If I hear of any more instances of you badgering or attacking administrators, or any other editors for that matter, by email, your email rights will also be withdrawn, and I will take steps to have you permanently banned from Wikipedia. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Your use of Wikipedia email has been withdrawn. If you wish to appeal your block please see WP:BASC. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Movie2k.to for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Movie2k.to is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movie2k.to until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TBrandley 18:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

File:9to5mac logo.png missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:34, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Movie2k.to[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Movie2k.to requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Amit (talk) 04:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovefilm logo.jpg.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lovefilm logo.jpg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rayukk (talk) 16:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)