User talk:Slacka123

Welcome!

Hello, Slacka123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Apteva (talk) 01:47, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Warsow Screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Warsow Screenshot.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Unlocked the account

... and I will have a dig around tomorrow, to see what happened. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks! Do I need to take any action like changing my password to prevent this from happening in the future? Slacka123 (talk) 14:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Probably not. Common Internet advice is to change password periodically. I have not seen hacking accounts a common issue on Wikipedia. WP is way too public for there to be any possible gain. The above Steward may be able to find out why the account was locked, and will let you know if they find anything, and probably if they did not find anything as well. Apteva (talk) 01:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 09:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

I added the histmerge tag to the new page. In the future, I will use the Move page option. Slacka123 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of game engines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of TeX editors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AGPL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Looking for expert opinion on this discussion

I thought you might be interested in participating in this discussion:

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Looking expert opinion in restore of article: Project64 and Talk:List of video game emulators#Revision of the merge consensus for Project64

Thanks! Valoem ^talk 16:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of game engines page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

List of game engines

Please STOP reverting my changes. You are, in my eyes, showing page ownership. I have replied in depth to you on the article's talk page, and you have ignored it. You reverted my first set of changes because of the engine type column. In response, I removed the engine type column. If you are not going to read my edit notes or my talk page discussion, please kindly let me edit. -- ferret (talk) 12:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

I want to apologize for missing one of your talk pages that was mid-discussion. I'm putting a lot of work in this, and it feels like you're not working with me, by reverting everything instead of trying to address the specific areas you have concerns with... I have created a section specifically detailing why I removed each of the engines you have been trying to add back, and also added one of them back directly. Please work with me without totally reverting everything else. I've listed my reasoning for each engine now, and it's primarily due to a completely lack of sources. If you can provide them, I'd be happy to see them added back. But they do need sources. -- ferret (talk) 13:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

You ignored my requests to discus this issue on the talk page, so I think its only fair that you rebase your edits off of my last version.

I don't know what your background is, but I first started editing this page several years ago, when I was researching game engines for a project I was working on. You come in and ignore the past discussions on this topic and ignore the editors who have been maintaining the page for years, even archiving the talk pages that discuss this very topic, which seemed kind of shady. I'm happy that you're cleaning up the proprietary engines, but I fail to see why you are so insistent that referenced engines or those based on commercial games need to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slacka123 (talk • contribs) 08:51, 20 July 2015‎ (UTC)

You say I've archived talk sections that discuss this topic, but I've read them all and that simply isn't the case. If anything, the talk archives support my position, particularly comments made by Marasmusine. Of the engines in question, only LOVE is mentioned in the archives, and it was questioned as being non-notable even then. The five sections that I archived directly, I did so because they lacked dated signatures, which prevents the auto-archiving from working. There's nothing shadey about cleaning up outdated sections, and the archives are visible to everyone. -- ferret (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Slacka123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Slacka123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Slacka123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Id Tech 2 (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Id Tech 2 (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Id Tech 2 (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 23:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)