User talk:SoyDream888
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Name one edit that I done in the past year that was wrong?
[edit]It seems the moment that you tell an inconvenient truth that multinationals aren't divesting from Russia. You suddenly get targeted despite What I said wasn't untrue. [1] One of the reasons why I don't make friends on Wikipedia is because I dare to mention such truths and originally I used to Edit war with them and got blocked. My edits wasn't wrong but my Fist editing mistake in the past, was not discussing in Talk and getting consensus. I learned that mistake now yet was never given a fair chance to redeem myself. So am asking for an unblock despite I know it's likely to get rejected. But take a good look at all my edits in the past month. That should be enough to prove that I am someone who deserves to edit. As I do not break the 3rr rule ever nor do I vandalise, and my information is valid. Just politically unliked.
SoyDream888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
my first ever indef block back when I was a new editor starting out, was unfair and overly harsh. I wasn't given much of a chance to go redeem myself. And that is why it was difficult for me to accept that. I edit warred with a user who later himself got blocked for persistent edit earring and socking himself. But the worst part is that he never got an indef ban despite getting into so many edit wars. My mistake was edit warring with him. So take into context that I was dealing with someone who frustrates others too. [2] [3] [4] I read the rules and it says you cannot undo an edit more than 3 Times in a day. I understood that simple thing. I look at Fobtown and when he edit wars, he keeps getting leniency. Like a few weeks block. Even after he gets blocked, he goes immediately to edit warring again and gets only 2 weeks block. Literally he and I both edit warred once and we got both blocked by admin BBB 23 for a week. In this article, I was correct that people shouldn't speculate. [5] He was trying so hard to claim that the China official Standard medal tally is adding hk, Taiwan and China medals together. But that's just excessive speculation. All we know is that China media published a social media post where it grouped the medals won by Hong Kong, China and Taiwan together and showed that the gold medal total was enough to beat America. That's all. Anything else further than that was speculating, yet Anti-China Hawks couldn't even be reasoned with. Yet after being both unblocked, he immediately went to revert my edits and I responded and undid that reverting. But I was still respecting the 3rr rule and only made 3 reverts maximum. Yet despite that to my surprise, only I got immediately blocked indefinitely but he didn't even get any punishment. That's when I felt that certain wiki staff was being discriminative. I then explained reasonably that I didn't know that you can break the 3rr rule even when you don't edit more than 3 Times a day and promised to not that. And to be fair, your rulebook wasn't that very clear about 3rr rule where even three reverts a day equals a block. And I promised to not do that again and give a second chance because I honestly didn't know you can break 3rr rule without actually exceeding 3 reverts in one day. Yet despite promising not to do it again, my unblock request was somehow rejected.[6] I was just a very new editor. If I could do it all over again. I would had not be baited into an edit war and go discuss it on Talk. I learned that lesson now but not before being indefinitely blocked. But my First punishment was harsh. I wasn't trying to break the rules but had asked for another unblock. I waited for over 6 months and got no response. I didn't wait for a few weeks but many months. Meanwhile the other guy got Zero days block despite he also reverted my edits after he got unblocked. How is that Fair? How do you expect anyone to be able to just accept that kind of treatment So I stopped waiting and Continued to edit as usual but constructively occasionally. Mostly anonymously. I don't expect you to unblock but my first indef block Really was extremely harsh. And is why I wasn't ever able to be okay with it. Lately I added requests to the Teahouse room. That shows that I have Changed. Am willing to get some consensus and not edit war. To discuss in Talk and to only edit constructively. I know I am unlikely to get unblocked but I believe I deserve a second chance. People should not be blocked forever and get at least one real chance. I explained my story. And take a good look at all my edits in the past month. That should be enough to prove that I am someone who deserves to edit. As I do not break the 3rr rule ever nor do I vandalise, and my information is valid. Just politically unliked. And btw, in case you reject my unblock request. I want to say take a good hard look at (social credit system) article. I know firsthand that social credit system is fake and I was the one who First mentioned that. I also know many experts saying Debt Trap diplomacy is fake and I added their voices in. The people who have issues with me, tend to be politically agressive against me because I add in Truth that they don't want people to know. And PUNISH me harshly. They were lucky that I was inexperienced and got blocked too Early but afterwards I know better than to Edit war like that Again. But Wikipedia needs people like me to tell the truth that scholars are saying that debt trap diplomacy has no evidence or that social credit system is just ignorant propaganda that's not backed by evidence. My first mistake was edit warring with such people who disagreed. I understand now to never make that mistake because I know it is how they get you blocked. And feel everyone deserves a proper second chance which I never got in touch the first place. I am willing to be a positive contributor. Always was. And do not think my very first indef block (and 6 months waiting for no reply to my appeal) was that fair in the first place. Of course, if I am unblocked. I will continue to edit the same way as I have done in the past month. You should look at my past edits and judge me on that. I always only correct misinformation or add in info in good Faith. I actually created a new Wikipedia article called Siwawa. If unblocked, I will likely complete it. I was already planning to complete that article this weekend and add in much useful information. My approved article on Siwawa shows I genuinely want to contribute well to Wikipedia and to respect consensus by going to noticeboard if I have issues. I don't expect to be unblocked but wanted to say that everyone deserves a real second chance if they genuinely want to contribute well. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135036222 SoyDream888 (talk) 22:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. Don't waste our time with a WP:WALLOFTEXT like this, the vast majority of which is completely irrelevant. Either you are evading an earlier block on a different account or you aren't. You seem to state you are. Therefore, this is a good block. Nothing else is relevant. Yamla (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Necessary to undo all my edits?
[edit]@Ponyo: I don't want to Deal with the politics of Wikipedia. But you are just undoing all my other edits that are not even political.
I get that you don't want people to know that most multinationals aren't divesting from Russia. Which is a fact and necessary context. [7] [8]
But you don't even read what I wrote in other articles. Which you undid. Some articles have myself countering incorrect information. Ken Yuasa was not part of unit 731. I gave sources to correct that misinformation in good faith. You are adding in back misinformation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135631390
Ironically I added this edit in to talk, telling other editors to please provide a source if they want to change the dates of the protests. I wasn't even wrong to suggest that any changes to dates needs a source. Was I wrong to suggest that?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135630956
And my contribution on articles like below including Jajangmyeon museum and Jjamppong are the kind of information that is needed to make the article not a stub or correct misinformation. My edits there were good Faith and to help readers know more information or the correct information.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jajangmyeon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135631874
In fact all the edits that you reverted. It shows that I don't try to vandalise or edit war. I actually try to add in responsible facts and contribute positively and discuss in talk. I should not have to pay for one mistake a long time ago.
The past month, I I actually do try to improve Wikipedia. If I try to edit positively, is it really necessary to also undo such edits too? If I correct misinformation. Is it really necessary to undo it?
Also as a Disclosure. I also created a new article called Siwawa. That got approved. Do you want to delete that too as you seem to have missed that? Without me that article would not even be on Wikipedia.
And also I am not even that mad. Because you are just wasting your own time. My info is correct so I can rest assure that if I wanted to. I can add it back in without much issues. Or someone else would. But the time it takes may be a few months to a few years. But eventually that information would be found on Wikipedia again.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135631878
That information is accurate and if not me. Someone else would add it in. You are just really delaying the inevitable BY deleting real information put in with good faith. :D
I don't even care that much about that info staying. I actually learn more about those topics by editing them and looking up sources. I gained knowledge and better Understanding of those topics so I have no regrets. And if I ever wanted to , I can easily add info like this back in however that's not important to me. But as a Wiki editor, you yourself need to weigh whether it's more important to punish me or to help Wikipedia.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135631878 SoyDream888 (talk) 23:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Contrary to what you've written above, you are not returning in an attempt to edit productively. Yoru creation of this account alone is block evasion and a blatant policy violation, yet you are also still creating multiple sock accounts to edit contentious topic areas simultaneously. Your words and your actions completely contradict each other and nothing you state above (or on the talk pages of the other accounts I just blocked) provides any allowance for you to repeatedly snub your nose at our policies and Terms of Use. You are banned from this project; do not ping me again.-- Ponyobons mots 23:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Contrary to what you wrote. I actually try to add in responsible facts and contribute positively and discuss in talk. I should not have to pay for one mistake a long time ago. Take a good hard look at the very edits that you had reverted.
My contribution on articles like Jajangmyeon Museum and Jjamppong are the kind of information that is needed to make the article not a stub or to correct misinformation. None of my edits deserve to be undone. It was in good Faith and to help readers know more information or the correct information.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jajangmyeon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135631874
In fact all the edits that was reverted. It Proves that I don't try to vandalise but Edit productively.
The funny thing was that I was going to go to Guizhou next month and take photo of Siwawa. And add in a photo to complete the article that I helped create. This shows that I am genuinely someone who wants to contribute.. I was going to add more Info to Siwawa to help readers understand it.
Yet it seems that's not going to happen when I am blocked. :(
So respectfully understand that one mistake in the distant past, shouldn't mean that I am not redeemable. I do genuinely Want to contribute. My approved article on Siwawa shows I genuinely want to contribute well to Wikipedia and to respect consensus by going to noticeboard if I have issues. I don't expect to be unblocked but wanted to say that everyone deserves a real second chance if they genuinely want to contribute well.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1135036222 SoyDream888 (talk) 00:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- @SoyDream888, the problem is that you have created multiple sock accounts. Why did you do this? Please answer in fewer than 100 words. Valereee (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)