User talk:SpacedOut84

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia! Drop by the Teahouse anytime for a cup of tea, or some help with editing![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! SpacedOut84, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 01:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States Deputy Secretary of State, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 17:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Hyena review[edit]

Thank you for taking the time to review the spotted hyena article. I greatly appreciate the kind words and suggestions directed at it.

I hope you won't mind my asking a question: you mentioned in your review that you learned much about the species that you didn't previously know. Might I ask what it was that you found out? I'm curious to see which aspects of certain animals are still largely unknown to the general public. Mariomassone (talk) 13:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SpacedOut84 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)

Request reason:

Hello, I was originally blocked for sockpuppetry back a while ago and I created another account and was banned again this past January. In total I have been blocked for some six months. I couldn't appeal for unblock on my original account, so I am going to use this one to appeal and I will make this the one and only account I use from now on. I am truly very sorry that I ever used different accounts, but if you look at my record under this account and under Sebastian80 you will see that I had been contributing in good faith. I even upgraded two articles to GA status and I really hope to continue editing and starting articles on Wikipedia. I have been doing some work on Citizendium, but I would like to continue my work here. So please, please allow me to continue editing. I will never again use a different account. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppets are virtually never unblocked. Apply from your primary account. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Judging by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeronicaPR/Archive, it looks to me like you created a number of sock accounts and were evading your block by editing logged out, over a period up until the end of April. That seems like more than "another account" to me. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I've made several accounts but I've been gone for quite sometime. I really am sorry and I will not do this again. Just give me a chance. SpacedOut84 (talk) 18:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Sebastian80 and LAx33 were editing in February 2012, and RedGKS in March 2012. You started editing with this SpacedOut84 account just a couple of weeks after RedGKS was blocked, and only stopped when you were blocked on April 29, 2012. That doesn't sound much like "gone for quite sometime" to me - it sounds more like you have been serially socking for as long as you thought you could get away with it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk)
Yes I admit to my mistakes and I am truly sorry for having done that. I really am very sorry and regretful. I just want to be able to edit without any fear of being banned and I will edit in good faith and will not make this mistake ever again. I just need another chance. I really wanted to come back with my Sebastian account, but I couldn't edit my talk page. So I chose to use this and stick with it. I promise that I will not create ANY other accounts for any reason. I really do hope I can be given a another chance. SpacedOut84 (talk) 19:25, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
You will need to apply from your primary account, which as far as I can see is VeronicaPR. If your actions have led to a block on your talk page access, use e-mail. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)