User talk:Speun
Welcome
[edit]
|
FC Twente honour
[edit]Winning the group stage would not be considered an honour. GiantSnowman 14:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
remove new information
[edit]Hello, you don't need to constantly remove new information from the page of the German national football team. The information has captions for competitions under the age of 23. Mahan Matin (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Germany national football team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahan Matin (talk • contribs) 16:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Spain national football team
[edit]Your recent editing history at Spain national football team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 16:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Sokoto
[edit]I cited the source wdym Takruri (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Takruri: Appreciate the effort and all, but that's not how it works. You can't just add a source that says nothing about the actual size of a political entity in numbers. We need an actual reliable source that says it was over 2.4 million km2. I can't see that number anywhere on the source you provided. You calculating it on your own on google maps, is considered original research and it means it is not reliable. Speun (talk) 15:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- more reliable than saying its 400 thousand km2
- The source i provided mentions the boundaries of it
- I admit i am not a reliable source but what i mentioned make sense
- Its impossible for it to have been that small,if anything the size of it should be ommited because the source provided isnt accurate either it doesnt take in to account agadez or hamdullahi Takruri (talk) 15:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- i wont change the thing again btw you have a point Takruri (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)