User talk:SpicyMemes123

Welcome!

Hi SpicyMemes123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Isabelle ^🔔 00:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standard notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Isabelle ^🔔 00:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your way of editing

Hi. I noticed in your contributions that you frequently use VisualEditor. However, source is quicker. You can learn more about source at Help:Wikitext. Happy editing! Cool guy (talk • contribs) • he/they 00:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a phobia of anything that looks like code; I will, in due time, try to get over this irrational fear and take your suggestion to heart. Thanks for dropping a line! SpicyMemes123 (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals

A tag has been placed on Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 06:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is my page visible to the public? If so, it shouldn't be. Again, I am new to page creation; but, I hope it is hidden as a draft! SpicyMemes123 (talk) 16:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes it is now a draft. When pages are moved, they leave behind a Redirect to the new page, which is what I tagged for deletion, and which you were notified about. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 17:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I did not intend to publish my draft! SpicyMemes123 (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! It's all sorted now. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 17:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)![reply]

Saying hello

Hi! I just wanted to drop by and wish you luck with your editing! I browsed your contributions and noticed that we are quite similar— both fairly new editors who enjoy memes and accidentally put drafts on the main page today (and then apologized profusely). Happy editing! Crunchydillpickle (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what's up! I literally gandered at your page five minutes ago; we both left 'thank you' messages on KylieTastic's page!

Good luck to you too Mister (or Misses) Pickle! SpicyMemes123 (talk) 01:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi SpicyMemes123! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Book links to authors, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi SpicyMemes123! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Question about biography and crime, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:First Principles

Hello, SpicyMemes123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Principles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kiwi Farms

Hi SpicyMemes123. I've reverted your edit to Talk:Kiwi Farms because an article's talk page is not the place to meander about the meaning of freedom of speech, nor is it the place for you to take potshots at people affected by the subject, as you did when you said: They are eccentric and I, personally do not like them; BUT, they have the right to be weird or unusual. Best, Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 12:36, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Isabelle,

It's not so much me taking a pot shot at people as it is me recognizing that people have the right to express themselves however they see fit provided that they do not harm other people in the process of doing so. For instance, I am not a homosexual nor am I interested in being a homosexual. But if you want to be gay that is okay both with me and in terms of natural law. Furthermore, you have the right not to be attacked criminally for your peaceable choices by cretins, say, from Kiwifarms.

But thanks for the heads-up in the sense that you explained WHY you reverted my edit to the talk page.

SpicyMemes123 (talk) 12:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just be aware for the future that our policies on information about living persons apply to all namespaces. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 12:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Isabelle,

Yeah, no doubt. Wikipedia is not my personal playspace. It's a give-and-take: I make edits which are in conjunction and compliance with established custom and rule. Got it.

But, philosophically, what I was initially trying to say in the post that you reverted is that life is a gift. ALL life is a gift. It is a gift that is both transcendental (given by the grace of God) and naturalistic (given by your parents: Father and Mother). The highest duty is the preservation of human life. Kiwifarms is evil because its consequence is the cessation of human life by virtue of the fact that, according to the Wikipedia article, three souls ended their sojourn here on Planet Earth vis-à-vis criminal harassment. That is horrible.

SpicyMemes123 (talk) 13:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Climax of Civilisation

Hello, SpicyMemes123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Climax of Civilisation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Climax of Civilisation

Hello, SpicyMemes123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Climax of Civilisation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom

Hello, SpicyMemes123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.enotes.com/topics/gaetano-mosca/critical-essays/criticism. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Edward Byron Reuter

Hello, SpicyMemes123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edward Byron Reuter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Edward Byron Reuter

Hello, SpicyMemes123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edward Byron Reuter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals

Hello, SpicyMemes123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:First Principles (Herbert Spencer)

Hello, SpicyMemes123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Principles (Herbert Spencer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:First Principles (Herbert Spencer)

Hello, SpicyMemes123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First Principles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]