User talk:StormBarn23

Welcome!

Hello, StormBarn23!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Hessel de Vries and Ricco's law. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you and apologies, I was not aware of the rule. StormBarn23 (talk) 15:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: De Vries - Rose Law (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:De Vries - Rose Law and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, please could you clarify which sources are not judged reliable, or which information is judged to lack a reliable source, and I'll do my best to rectify the issue. The article does refer to the original papers that give the law its name, plus other refereed papers and books on vision science. StormBarn23 (talk) 09:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just amended the reference to Poisson statistics, if that's any help. StormBarn23 (talk) 12:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't heard anything further so will re-submit now and see if the latest change helps. StormBarn23 (talk) 09:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've also supplied a couple of specific page references for relevant points in the papers of Rose and De Vries. StormBarn23 (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StormBarn23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: De Vries - Rose Law has been accepted

De Vries - Rose Law, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sionk (talk) 17:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]