Jump to content

User talk:Stvjns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Stvjns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  dbtfztalk 03:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aug2005-01.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aug2005-2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:July2005-01.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 07:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crop Circles

[edit]

Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you. --Darkfred Talk to me 20:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deleting sections and adding nonsense to the article Crop circles. If you disagree with the current article then please join the ongoing discussion on the talk page. --Darkfred Talk to me 03:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Crop Circles are not wanted. You have been reverted by 6 seperate editors, you have been asked to defend your changes on the talk page, you have not responded yet you continue to blank sections of the article. I am refering your actions to an administrator. --Darkfred Talk to me 22:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second the requests above. Please stop blindly reverting Crop circle to your version. You have not sought consensus once by discussing your changes on the talk page, and have only given an edit summary on one occasion. That summary urges other editors to "do your homework". You should understand that unsourced, unreferenced and unverifiable material can and should be removed from Wikipedia by any editor. To take a single sentence from your edit: The crops appear to scientists to be flattened using an unknown technique involving microwaves, magnetism, and electricity. You have offered no source for this statement: which scientists state this, and in which reputable publication(s) have they said it? Moreover, if the technique is unknown, how is it known that it involves microwaves, magnetism, and electricity? You have reverted this article four times in the last 24 hours. This is a violation of Wikipedia's 3 revert rule. Actions like this by any editor may lead to being blocked. {Add: I see Darkfred beat me to it.)--BillC 22:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. BillC 23:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block on crop circle

[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 12 hours. William M. Connolley 19:08, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gm_icon_logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 21:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crop circles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please refrain from adding original research, personal commentary and unreliable sources. You need to discuss controversial changes on the talk page, and if you're violating the above named policies, don't even begin to discuss them. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gargoyle Mechanique for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gargoyle Mechanique is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gargoyle Mechanique until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]