User talk:Sugarangel12

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Scoubidou, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Luke (Talk) 13:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Chelmsford. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 11:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wattpad may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

fashion-spy-wattys2014 The Fashion Spy] by [http://www.wattpad.com/user/sunsetvibes sunsetvibes]) - Teen Fiction/ Chicklit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peyton Meyer (2) (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AdventurousSquirrel was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peyton Meyer (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sugarangel12, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cruft

In regards to what you added to meme, Wikipedia doesn't need unsourced fancruft. We prefer you add content sourced to newspapers, magazines, and academic journals. More often than not, internet phenomenon does not belong here on Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Chloë Grace Moretz. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 16:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]