User talk:Sun4hr

Welcome

Hello, Sun4hr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! 220 of ^ßorg 03:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Hello, I'm HurricaneTracker495. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneTracker495::I hope you are well. Thank you for reaching out to me for clarification. Please note that I have given references to the article from the most reputed newspapers/ channels (Dawn, The News, Geo TV) in Pakistan. Therefore, I request you to consider them and let the added references to the article get published.

Thank you for your attention and consideration.--Sun4hr (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanveer Jahan

The article Tanveer Jahan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Northern Escapee (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Escapee::Thank you for reaching out to me. Please note that I have given references to the article from the reputed English newspapers (Dawn, The News, Daily Times) in Pakistan. Thank you for your attention, cooperation, and consideration. --Sun4hr (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Escapee::: I have added several references to the articles, and have addressed the issues highlighted in the template. thank you --Sun4hr (talk) 08:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sun4hr. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nida Usman Chaudhary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nida Usman Chaudhary, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of lums.edu.pk/events/lums-live-session-47-remembering-justice-ginsburg-confronting-womens-challenges-pakistans and learnpak.com.pk/our-team. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSS ^💬 04:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sun4hr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please note that the computer and network connection I am using is under the use of multiple persons and registered editors. Please rest assured that I am not paid for my contribution by any person or institution. I am a new editor with experience of just three months, and I'll make sure that this does not happen again. I am open to learning, suggestions, and guidelines to make productive contributions to Wikipedia. Therefore, I request you to unblock the accounts. Thank you Sun4hr (talk) 07:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sun4hr/Archive. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sun4hr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please note that I was one of the participants of the WikiGap Pakistan Online Challenge, under which I contributed nine articles during November and December 2020. Like me, two new Wikipedia editors Nonie20azm and Shabaloch2210 have been editing pages, I created, to have a hands-on experience of how to contribute to Wikipedia. The issue started when Nonie20azm contributed his very first article on 9 January and made an attempt to upload it on the main space that was moved to the draft by an Editor. Discouraged by this action, Nonie20azm requested me to review his article and upload it in the main space, if possible. I reviewed and uploaded the article on 18 January, which was well shorter than the previous draft. Resultantly, I was blocked from editing on 19 January. Please accept my apology for the lack of information about the Wikipedia guidelines. Please rest assured that I am not paid for my contribution to Wikipedia by any person or institution. I request you to unblock the accounts and guide me further so that I could make a positive contribution to Wikipedia. Thank you. Sun4hr (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Sounds right to me. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon:: Thank you so much for considering my request and unblocking my account which remained blocked for four months. Please note that two of the pages namely Draft:Anjum James Paul and Draft:Peter Jacob that I contributed, were moved from mainspace to the drafts during the time when my account was blocked, therefore I humbly request you to move the pages back to the mainspace, and also remove the block template from my user page. Thank you so much for your cooperation in anticipation.--Sun4hr (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit your own user page. You'll need to go through WP:AfC to move those pages back to mainspace, though perhaps User:GSS, who moved them to draft, might be willing to do it for you. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS:: Please note that my account has been unblocked four months after it was blocked, therefore I humbly request you to move the pages Draft:Anjum James Paul and Draft:Peter Jacob back to mainspace, that I contributed to Wikipedia. Thank you so much for your cooperation in anticipation.--Sun4hr (talk) 06:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tanveer Jahan

Hello, Sun4hr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tanveer Jahan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anjum James Paul moved to draftspace

I've moved Anjum James Paul to Draft:Anjum James Paul. As per the requirements of your account unblocking this needs to go through WP:AfC. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anjum James Paul

Hello, Sun4hr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anjum James Paul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Jacob (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeverTry4Me was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Jacob and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 10:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sun4hr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 10:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]