User talk:Supercars09

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Supercars09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Friday (talk) 17:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bugatti[edit]

Hi, the edit you made here was not supported by the sourced used, so I've put it back the way it was. Do you have a source for a 2.5-second 0-60 time? Friday (talk) 17:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do have many sources. Lots of TV programmes, e.g. top Gear, Fifth gear, all publish its 0-60 time of 2.5 seconds.To back this further, quite a few supercars have a 3.2 0-60, which furtherly defeats the object of fastest accelerating prduction car.I also personally remember its 0-60 time using the ariel atom's (2.7 secs) to 60 and knocking off 2/10's of a second. If you disagree, please reply. Supercars09 (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

realisation[edit]

well, it seems that you have been pretty precise with that acceleration time. I'd say you're right, but i'd round that figure up.

Hmm, I'm not sure which source I was looking at the other day... now I see [1] and [2] which both say 2.5. So apparently it's an accurate figure. Friday (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see what I did now. I was misreading the source that was used. Sorry about that. Looks like someone else already fixed it. Friday (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrari 458[edit]

What happened here? swa q 15:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Theo Paphitis, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 09:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Theo Paphitis Looking Hard At Camera.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Theo Paphitis Looking Hard At Camera.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 10:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Alan Sugar Pointing.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Alan Sugar Pointing.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 10:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Deborah-meaden.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Deborah-meaden.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sir richard-branson.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Sir richard-branson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Theo Pahitis Looking Hard At Camera.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Theo Pahitis Looking Hard At Camera.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 10:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Amy Winehouse, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 12:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supercars09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My password was accidentally divulged and my Wikipedia privileges were subsequently abused resulting in my blockage. Supercars09 (talk) 11:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:GOTHACKED (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supercars09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has suffered numerous hack attempts,four of which have been successful and I have not been able to find out how to change my password to prevent this happening. I request that my account be unblocked due to these reasons which have been out of my control, and I will also need to find out how to change my Wikipedia password to a stronger one. Supercars09 (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, "due these reasons" you will remain blocked for the foreseeable future. If your account has been hacked, it's quite simple for a hacker to claim that he is the original owner of the account, so changing the password is a futile endeavour on your part (it's done here for future reference). Did you even read the link B.wilkins gave you in his decline of your previous unblock request? I suspect not, and I suggest you do that before attempting another request. Closedmouth (talk) 13:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supercars09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Talk to Terry! Now, I see that you high and mighty WikiNerds are abusin' your power which has been given to you by His Royal Wikiness His Majesty James Wales to pick on innocent users who maybe just wanna read abart fings, y' know? Comin' from a poor background, I grabbed anythin' that's free, y'know what I'm sayin'? And Wikipeedia has given me the right to copy and paste complicated words n' fings for ma homeworks for school, and it's what gave me my 8 E grades at da end of it. And y'know, I shouldn't ha dunnit, coz Wikipeedia is abart as reliable as my 3rd wife's $1.00 pregnancy test she bought in an alleyway darn in Bruklin, when we was on holiday there in '96. Anyways, I better be getting back ta runnin' my Fortune 500 'diaper' business, so goodbye much love, Terry xoxSupercars09 (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Kinu ^t/_c 18:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.