User talk:Susan.grayeff

Hello, Susan.grayeff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 02:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC) also, if you have questions about editing, please go to the wp:Teahouse. --- Duckduckgo (talk) 15:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Women in science[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not (especially Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought) so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Insulam Simia (talk) 14:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Insulam Simia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Insulam Simia (talk) 14:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Dubious edits to female scientists. Thank you. Insulam Simia (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Material[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! L smll 06:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Namaste. I've reverted several edits of yours, such as those made to Wikimedia Commons, Bracket, and Static (keyword) because they either appeared to be test edits, original research or were not constructive. If you would like to experiment with Syntax, please do so in your sandbox: (User:Susan.grayeff/sandbox). If you need help with syntax, please see the links at the bottom of this page: Help:Editing. There is also a collection of helpful links and guidelines available on my talk page, and of course, if you need any other assitance at all, feel free to leave me a message there and I'll do my best to help. Thank you. -- dsprc ^[talk] 16:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Susan.grayeff/sandbox (August 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Shanata. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Oleic acid because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Shanata (talk) 09:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oleic acid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Please discuss your proposed changes on the talk page; your statement is already in the article, but does not belong in the lede Shanata (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Susan.grayeff/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:45, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Susan.grayeff, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:45, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Supdiop was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Susan.grayeff/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Supdiop (talk) 00:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Susan.grayeff, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Supdiop (talk) 00:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Susan.grayeff/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Susan.grayeff. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm ^talk 19:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bay leaf. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please also ensure you use edit summaries and check your contributions for typos, cheers! Captainllama (talk) 15:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I noticed that nearly all of your recent edits have been undone for various reasons: they often contain grammatical/logic flaws and some even outright incorrect details. Please make sure what you add is at least supported by cited references. DMacks (talk) 19:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ribosome, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plantsurfer 08:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]