User talk:Sydney2011

I love you

hello Sydney2011,

A red rose to someone who is in my heart.
--'--,--@ the guy in n° 189.4.30.29 (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)'[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemogenic Endothelium.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 14:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tumor-associated macrophage.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 17:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a few improvements to this and put it into mainspace at Tumor-associated macrophage. In my opinion the main thing it was missing were wikilinks, and some simpler language. But it was certainly a great start and full of useful info. --99of9 (talk) 13:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemogenic Endothelium concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemogenic Endothelium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Hemogenic Endothelium

Hello Sydney2011. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Hemogenic Endothelium.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemogenic Endothelium}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HI

It is unclear what you are doing and how you are doing. You appear to have drafted content elsewhere and then just dumped into articles, many times. This is not OK. In this dif you even added a 2nd reference list.

I have gone through and reverted all your additions for now. Why are you editing this way? Please do answer. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 03:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]