User talk:TRIRASH

Hi, just got tagged for speedy deletion for article mjdf. Am currently working to clean-up the article so will remove the tag when done. Ashley Payne 10:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Ioeth#New Article - Kevin Carvell

I do agree, but that article doesn't meet the definition of patent nonsense. As the article asserts notability, and doesn't seem to meet any of the CSD criteria, you can PROD it and then AFD it if the PROD fails. --Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 15:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion advisements

Hi. :) In reviewing Category:Candidates for speedy deletion, I came upon an article you had tagged, Clan Fw, and I noticed that you had not notified the article's creator of the nomination. I just wanted to drop you a line to ask you to please when you tag articles in the future take the few extra seconds to let the author know by copying & pasting the notification listed at the bottom of the template on his or her talk page. This can save some legwork down the line when the editor comes back looking for the article and can't immediately figure out what happened to it. I've seen many of those confused people wind up at the help desk in a state of panic. :) Thanks for keeping out an eye on article quality. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. From now I will take care to notify author.

TRIRASH 04:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Just a quick note to thank you for your work here in trying to keep this place clean and beautiful! Have a great day. AKRadecki^Speaketh 23:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

R&I

R&I is protected for a reason, and the page which you tried to speedy is a sandbox project in an attempt to bring resolution. Thanks! --Kevin Murray 13:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

I notioced that you are very active in proposing deletions even though you've only been a contributor to WP since 19:03, 18 October 2007. With only a few days of experiance, don't you think you should learn the customs and rules before making judgement calls? Please spend some time as a writer before trying to apply policy. Cheers! --Kevin Murray 14:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion policies

Hi. It's me again. :) Thank you for taking the time to place user notifications. That's a very helpful part of the speedy deletion process. I see that you've been doing a good job tagging a number of articles for deletion with valid criteria. I noticed, though, that some of the tags you're using for speedy are invalid criteria, like this one. There are a limited range of reasons by which administrators are supposed to delete articles through speedy, and articles that do not fall within that range should be deleted by other means, like WP:PROD or WP:AfD. I wanted to suggest at this point that you might like to brush up on the deletion policies and read over the criteria for speedy deletion and the support guidelines, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Explanations. Obviously, if you're going to be a dedicated new page patroller, you want to be very familiar with these policies. Again, thank you for helping out. You've identified many articles that don't conform to policy, and we appreciate your dedication. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I was not the first one to tag Nellie massacre. I merely explained that link cited by author is not neutral. You do not know how controversial Tehelka is. The political party ruling India is changed. If former political party had been in power, government of India might have blocked whole wikipedia in India because of this Tehelka. Wikipedia need neutral, uncontroversial sources and I merely explained it. I am still seeing Nellie massacre with just tehelka.com link and a reference to book which you never read and credibility of which you don't know. Choice is admins like you. My job is to bring to your notice what you don't know.

Just today someone created article Race and Intelligence/background. To explain that other article Race and Intelligence already exist, I can not use reguler templates. I will have to explain reason why such pages deserve speedy deletion.

I am following Wikipedia:Ignore all rules as directed by Jimbo Wales and I am following it in its spirit, underlying meaning. I am not going just by words.

Having said that, I will take extreme precautions.

Thanks.

TRIRASH 18:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Apology

Hi and thanks for the note you left on my talk page. It looks like another admin took care of the problem while I was away. I do need to apologize to you, though...I also replied on my talk page, and in my edit summary my fat fingers mispelled your user name and it came out "Tritrash" rather than "Trirash"...please be assured that I'm not intending to poke fun at your user name, or to call you or your hard work "trash"...it was merely a typo, and unfortunately, edit summaries can't be edited. I feel really embarrassed by this, as I don't want you to think it was some subtle dig or commentary. Have a great day and keep up the hard work! AKRadecki^Speaketh 18:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

umm... It doesn't matter how you spell my username. I lost ego long ago when I changed my real name in 1993 officially. After 1993, I am nameless. I am everyone.

Anyway we are here to help project. Personal like, dislike does not matter. TRIRASH 18:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

My userpage

My userpage is written properly. You misunderstood it.

I think you should be more patient before requesting check users. I value my privacy, and had done nothing to deserve this. Dmn € Դմն 11:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I have already apologized on your talk page. Request was taken back within few minutes. This confusion arised because you edited non-english article and creator of that article went on creating other page with same non-english content. If you understand that langauge, you could have helped to translate it instead of just making letters bold. This is english wikipedia.

I apologize again. Thanks. TRIRASH 12:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Evans Lake (British Columbia)

I have boldly removed your speedy delete tag. Please see edit history and article talk page. Thhanks. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 15:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I am still trying to figure out what you are doing. But certainly you creation summary of Evans Lake (British Columbia) is dubious. I also see that your article is shrinked suddenly rather than expandin. I am still tracking. My apology if I am tracking right user. Thanks. TRIRASH 15:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Hah, You think you're confused! When I stub sorted Evans Lake, it had the content now at Evans Lake (British Columbia). So I reverted that to the content now at Evans Lake (South Georgia). Then I copy and pasted the BC lake to its own article and removed the advertising. Then I moved the South Georgia lake to that article. Then, I turned Evans Lake into a disambiguation page. Then I added links in the articles to the disambiguation page. Now, I'm going to have lunch! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 16:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Psyco Gundam

My involvement in that series of articles extends only to the three pages I protected because of edit warring... I suggest you ask an admin more familiar with the topic for help, such as A Man In Black. east.718 at 20:07, 11/4/2007

From India?

Hey, are you from India? If you are, and if you're familiar with national politics there, I could use some input on something. Drop me a line when you get back on WP. AKRadecki^Speaketh 22:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)