User talk:Tantane Director

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tantane Director, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Twins in Crime (2023 film), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Twins in Crime (2023 film)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Twins in Crime (2023 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Tantane Director. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Twins in Crime (2023 film), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that my previous contributions were flagged as spam/advertising, and I sincerely apologize for any violations of Wikipedia's guidelines. I have since reviewed Wikipedia's policies and started making necessary adjustments to ensure that my future contributions align with the platform's content standards. Regrettably, I was blocked before I could complete these adjustments. I am committed to maintaining a neutral and encyclopedic tone in my edits. I kindly request the removal of my block to continue contributing positively to Wikipedia. Tantane Director (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's less about the specifics of the article, though the directly promotional links were certainly a serious problem. You created an article about your own film, using an account that identifies you as a particular film director. The username itself may be a violation of the username policy, and creating an article about your own work is at best a conflict of interest and at worst a very serious promotional problem, even without the links. We have a list of "things to avoid when creating your first article", and number one is "things about yourself or people you know" and number two is "promotion". AntiDionysius (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First, I want to express my understanding and appreciation for your time and the guidance you've provided. I have come to realize that there may be issues with the Wikipedia page associated with my film project. Therefore, I would like to request the deletion of the page. I believe it is best to have professionals and experienced Wikipedia editors address and resolve these concerns. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines in the future and ensuring that any contributions are in compliance. Thank you for your assistance and understanding in this matter. Tantane Director (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your response to my unblock request. I acknowledge the reasons for my block, which were related to creating an article about my own film using an account that identifies me as a particular film director. I understand that this may have been a violation of Wikipedia's username policy and a conflict of interest. Furthermore, I recognize that the article I created may have had promotional elements, even without the directly promotional links.

I have thoroughly reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines and understand the importance of adhering to them. I apologize for any damage or disruption my previous contributions may have caused, and I am committed to making useful and constructive contributions in line with Wikipedia's policies. To rectify these issues, I now understand the need to prepare content that is free from promotional language. I also plan to reach out to professionals to handle the adaptation for the film project, ensuring that no self-adaptations are made. I kindly request a reconsideration of my unblock request, and I assure you that I will continue to adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. Tantane Director (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your decision to decline my unblock request. I acknowledge that my previous contributions may have caused damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and I take full responsibility for this. I now have a clearer understanding of the reasons for my block, particularly regarding the creation of an article about my own film and potential promotional elements.

I want to assure you that I am fully committed to not causing further damage or disruption and to making useful contributions to Wikipedia in the future. I also understand that, as the owner of the content, and especially if the content is about me, I have no right to create or edit articles about it. Wikipedia's 'Conflict of interest' (COI) guidelines advise against such actions, and I am fully committed to adhering to these guidelines.

I kindly request a reconsideration of my unblock request, and I am determined to demonstrate my commitment to Wikipedia's policies. Additionally, I would like to request the deletion of the article related to my film. Tantane Director (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tantane Director (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Tantane Director (talk) 16:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tantane Director (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand your decision to decline my unblock request. I acknowledge that my previous contributions may have caused damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and I take full responsibility for this. I now have a clearer understanding of the reasons for my block, particularly regarding the creation of an article about my own film and potential promotional elements. I want to assure you that I am fully committed to not causing further damage or disruption and to making useful contributions to Wikipedia in the future. I also understand that, as the owner of the content, and especially if the content is about me, I have no right to create or edit articles about it. Wikipedia's 'Conflict of interest' (COI) guidelines advise against such actions, and I am fully committed to adhering to these guidelines. I kindly request a reconsideration of my unblock request, and I am determined to demonstrate my commitment to Wikipedia's policies. Additionally, I would like to request the deletion of the article related to my film. Tantane Director (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; user no longer wishes to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 10:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can't just make empty unblock requests. Please reread WP:GAB to understand how to use the unblock template. --Yamla (talk) 18:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A sincere thanks for taking that into account and modifying your unblock request. I appreciate it. Another admin will be along to review your request. --Yamla (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tantane, what "article related to my film"?--Bbb23 (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe they're referring to Draft:Twins in Crime (2023 film), but it was deleted a while ago. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What edits do you wish to make, since you won't be editing about your films? 331dot (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I kindly request the permanent closure and deletion of my account, as I no longer have a need for it. Please proceed with the necessary steps to finalize this request. Tantane Director (talk) 09:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible to delete an account. However, you are free to simply stop using it. Note that blocks apply to the person, not just the account, so while this account remains blocked, you are not permitted to edit en.wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 10:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]