User talk:Tassulisko

Welcome!

Hello, Tassulisko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tassulisko, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tassulisko! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Pianolisko

Hi there,

It looks like all of your edits have to do with inserting information about the band/artist Pianolisko. Thanks for trying to improve Wikipedia with this information, but it's very rare that we include examples involving artists that aren't notable. Most of the time that means we just don't include e.g. cover songs or other trivia regarding bands that do not themselves have Wikipedia articles. If they've received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, perhaps you'd be interested to start the article? I'll post a welcome message following this edit which contains some useful links to check out if you're interested. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're repeatedly adding it to Beds Are Burning. Note that Wikipedia has strict rules about "edit warring". Doing so more than 3 times within 24 hours results in being blocked from editing. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pianolisko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pianolisko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this one admin said I should write the article about the band! -_-

Proposed deletion of Tarvo Merkällinen

The article Tarvo Merkällinen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kleuske (talk) 14:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added references - sorry I hit "save" too early... but who doesn't if you don't want to loose what you wrote? ô.o

Nomination of Tarvo Merkällinen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tarvo Merkällinen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarvo Merkällinen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand why Wiki is so focussed on commercial things instead of showing being that what they do the propaganda with: "a source for free and independent knowledge". So that means the commerce has to be fucked and ignored. The sources have to be there and have to show evidence NO MATTER what kind of source this is.