User talk:Taykathcat

Welcome

Hello, Taykathcat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Toddst1 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Create new pages

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Michael Klaper

A tag has been placed on Michael Klaper, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 18:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sister Jeannette Normandin - Bodhisattva has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Toddst1 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ruth hiller

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles

Please do not create duplicate articles as you did with Keydong Nunnery and Juan Carrero. I have redirected those to the articles you created earlier. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. You've recreated Create new pages with copyrighted material. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for ignoring warnings and adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article redirected

Your creation of Martin Jenco has been redirected to the existing page, Lawrence Jenco. If you have any information to add to this subject, please do so at its current title. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Franklin-Ramirez

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Louise Franklin-Ramirez, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://prop1.org/hnpc/030818wp.louise.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Louise Franklin-Ramirez

A tag has been placed on Louise Franklin-Ramirez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —BradV 17:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I'm concerned because I noticed that many- most, even- of your edits are related to an organization called Peace Abbey. Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree not to write about ourselves or our organizations. I just wanted to point that guideline out to you, in case you were using Wikipedia to promote your own organization and didn't realize that the rules don't allow that. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued addition of copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Carrero Saralegui

If you feel this person is notable (and you clearly do), you will have to create an article about him yourself. The version which has been repeatedly deleted is a violation of copyright laws, a topic we take seriously here. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Pagoda

The material you added to Peace Pagoda has been reverted twice because it is about the Nipponzan-Myōhōji order, not about peace pagodas. I have added a summary of it to the Nipponzan article though its notabilty is not obvious. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I remain concerned that your only apparent purpose on Wikipedia is to promote a specific organization; in my opinion, continuing to edit in that way places you at risk of being indefinitely blocked. If you decide to keep editing after the block expires, I strongly encourage you to stay away from citing Peace Abbey or writing about people affiliated with it, and demonstrate your willingness to edit neutrally by writing about subjects with which you do not have a direct connection. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]