User talk:Tbeyor

Proposed deletion of Andrew Tarbet

Hello, Tbeyor. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Andrew Tarbet, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Andrew Tarbet to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tbeyor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tbeyor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from List of Oggy and the Cockroaches episodes. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Diff: [1] The {{vague}} template you removed is there because the content preceding it is vague and needs to be clarified. "Take matters into their own hands" doesn't tell us anything about what happens in the episode, which is the entire point of a plot synopsis. If you are operating under the assumption that we should be writing vague loglines as summaries, that is inaccurate. An ideal summary should be 150-200 words and should cover the beginning, middle and end of each episode. Please see WP:TVPLOT for more info. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines

Please note that per WP:SPS, wikis are not considered reliable sources and should not be used in citations. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please don't add information that you know should be sourced with a CN tag. If you have a source, include it. If you don't have a source, don't add the information. DonIago (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tbeyor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter Mudu

The article Walter Mudu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject fails to notability guidelines WP:ENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingstoken (talk) 23:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]