User talk:Teklaoctan

Reply

Hi and welcome. I think you misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. It's an encyclopaedia, not somewhere to post your profile or highlight your research, somewhere like LinkedIn would be better for that

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

Your supposed references appear to be your own publications, which are not independent third-party sources, and they are not in line, so we can't tell what claims in your text each is confirming.
You may meet the notability criteria linked above, but we need verifiable facts, not a self-statement

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Your text, as you yourself claim, appears to have little purpose other to publish your resume and research

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I didn't check, despite the absence of wikilinks and references raising some concerns.

Not a reason for deletion, but you didn't have a single wikilink, eg biochemistry, molecular biology Jagiellonian University, Kraków, bikunin, protein etc

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to say that publications should be properly formatted too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:34, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explanation. I will refrain from any further trials to contribute to Wikipedia and leave it to those who have time to comprehend the intricate system of rules. I understand that information on currently active scientist in not of interest for Wikipedia readers. Teklaoctan (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna M Blom (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anna M Blom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teklaoctan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Anna M Blom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Anna M Blom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explanation. I will refrain from any further trials to contribute to Wikipedia and leave it to those who have time to comprehend the intricate system of rules. I understand that information on currently active scientist in not of interest for Wikipedia readers. Teklaoctan (talk) 07:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Teklaoctan: Whether they are currently active or not isn't the issue. A person in an academic field must meet the notability criteria for academics to be considered worthy of inclusion. Since you are not capable of being an objective judge of your own notability, you should refrain from writing about yourself. If what you have done in life is truly notable and meets our criteria for inclusion, someone who is unaffiliated with you will eventually write about you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anna M Blom

Hello, Teklaoctan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anna M Blom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]