Jump to content

User talk:The Pen Pusher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, The Pen Pusher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hello The Pen Pusher and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 11:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Pen Pusher (talk) 13:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC) - Hello Warren, thanks for your feedback. The backroom on Wikipedia is bigger than I imagined but I am getting to know it bit by bit. Not sure if you can be specific but wondering where I fell short with the image. You might end up saying "where didn't you".[reply]
The image was fairly confusing to figure out how it relates to the Universe article, or mainstream cosmology in general. I'm not a cosmologist, but I do have an astrophysics background and I couldn't for the life of me figure out how to relate it to the article. A lot of the terminology used in that figure doesn't turn up in a quick literature review, though again this is outside my wheelhouse and I could be wrong. Could you provide either a source for the figure (I know it's your creation, but where your underling data etc. is from) or explain it better?
It's entirely possible I misunderstood something here but if someone with some familiarity with cosmology is getting tripped up it may be a more substantial issue in the article. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Pen Pusher (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Warren, Thanks for getting back. I will admit that it is a daring image but not sure how else to get it in front of the big brains. The basis of the image relates to many of the cosmological observations as a well as anomalies that exist in the present day. The big idea is to go absolutely bigger than we could ever dare to imagine. At the core is a Quantum Sphere (reluctant to use "God" because scientists fear using a "God Factor"). None the less an entity that is conscious (if we truly think we know how to define consciousness). Above the surface and "suspended" on a space-time "membrane" is our Entire Universe. Within the Entire Universe is a region that we only know about, The Observable Universe (93 billion light years). The Scale is off the charts but comprehendible when viewed on this comparative (graphic) level. And spread out through this Entire Universe there is a mechanism in operation to congregate all the negative and positive energy (they are equal and cancel to Zero) through the mechanism of Black Hole formation where these large body objects find a way towards each other by rolling along the "suspended" fabric of space-time. We are talking about a lot of time. I could be either brave or mad, or both to think that such a simple diagram might closely reflect Big Bang(Big Flash), Black Holes, Space-Time Fabric, Quantum Mechanics, Observable Universes, and Hubble Tension. That's my pitch. :) The Pen Pusher (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still not able to follow any of this, but I do have a bit better sense of what I'm dealing with now. You should be familiar with WP:PROFRINGE and WP:NOR. Given your only edits here so far you'll likely be pretty swiftly blocked from Wikipedia on a permanent basis if you attempt to edit your theory back into Wikipedia.
If you'd like some advice on how to get it in front of some eyes, I'd suggest working through a sequence of physics degrees and publishing your findings at the conclusion of your dissertation. Hope that helps! Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 20:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Pen Pusher (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Warren, Many thanks. Yes I did have a read of these articles and I have a better understanding of the well provisioned governance to keep all the information uncorrupted. And yes rightly so. To be honest I had naively imagined that it operated on a kind of "innocent until proven guilty" or "true until proved false" way. Where I inserted the image under shape there are three possible options. At the very most only one can be right. And to satisfy my delusions I would say that all three are close but not correct. The delusion is that the observable universe is not a sphere but merely a "circular" patch on a vastly larger quantum sphere that encapsulates the designer with a quantum consciousness. But that's a discussion for another day. Thanks again for the manner in which you applied the edit and addressed my questions. No harm done :) The Pen Pusher (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Pen Pusher You need to realize that this is not a venue for original research or fringe theories and we have a very healthy immune system keeping them off of Wikipedia. You're going to spend a lot of time writing content that's instantly deleted. Keep in mind that your theories thus far are nonsensical to people with backgrounds in the topic, so it's possibly a better use of time to focus on the basics rather than the usual fringe theorist junk of reinventing cosmology. This is a path that leads to an enormous amount of unrewarded effort being spent and while you do you, I strongly encourage you to engage with this without thinking you're going to outsmart Hawking. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 10:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Pen Pusher (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Warren,
My Principles...
None lesser than you - None greater than you
Free Your Mind - Ask Any Question - Seek The Truth
Trust The Process
...and as you can see Wikipedia has not been adversely affected by my actions...and I am not adversely affected by my actions or Wikipedia's actions.
...if your fire alarm dosen't go off from time to time then how do you know its working correctly...
Many thanks for the opportunity to have an interesting conversation with you. I do mean it.
Wishing you the best possible 2025 :) The Pen Pusher (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia was adversely affected by your actions, though. You vandalized it with pseudoscience, which is unhelpful. If you'd like to continue editing here you'll need to leave your own personal interpretations of physics at home. Best of luck! Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 19:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, The Pen Pusher! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but among the things not accepted into Wikipedia is original research, which I believe this is. Moreover, Wikipedia articles summarise what other, reliable sources have previously published about a subject. This draft (such as it is) cites no sources at all. I have therefore rejected your draft. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:The Pen Pusher

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:The Pen Pusher has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Seems to be back. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 19:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Pen Pusher: please do not develop content on your user page, it is not what that page is there for; please read WP:UP for information on what may, and may not, go on your user page. Please move that content into a subpage, or it will be deleted without further warning. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Pen_Pusher&oldid=1266600611"