Jump to content

User talk:Thegodfathero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastian Punnakkal Philip (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thegodfathero! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Thegodfathero. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sebastian Punnakkal Philip, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring and POV edits at Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence[edit]

Please stop inserting your opinion that the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence is a "hate-group" into the WP:LEADSENTENCE of the article, backed only by an opinion by a politician. Each time it has been reverted for policy reasons, such as WP:Verifiability, WP:DUE, and WP:BLPSOURCES. In addition, it's bad form to use an edit summary of "revert vandalism" to describe an edit where you are edit warring to restore your POV edit, previously removed for good cause. Rather than edit-warring, discuss your desired changes with other editors on the Talk page of the article. See also the WP:BRD guideline. A continued pattern of reinserting this material in the face of opposition from multiple editors may be seen as WP:DISRUPTIVE, and could lead to a suspension of your editing privileges. If you have any questions, or if you disagree, please feel free to {{Reply}} below, or at the Talk page of the article. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Erp (talk) 14:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sreelakshmi Suresh[edit]

Stop removing a lot of information without providing any explanation of its removal Kudiophi clopsvimbi (talk) 08:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]