Jump to content

User talk:Thevikingovikingo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ezequiel Matthysse (May 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 01:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thevikingovikingo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ezequiel Matthysse (June 2)

[edit]

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Ezequiel Matthysse|cv=no|reason=athlete|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment= This draft does not appear to indicate that one of the sports notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a sportsperson or other subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the sports notability criteria (or other notability criteria) at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NBOXING for notability.

The basis for satisfying [[WP:NBOXING|boxing notability appears to be holding an amateur WBC world championship. Please provide the details, with the appropriate reference, on the draft talk page. Since the originator of this draft has demanded, repeatedly, that the reviewers review it, the originator should do the work for the reviewers of explaining exactly how the subject satisfies notability.

Also, see the comment of the previous reviewer about overlinking.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Also, please answer whether you have a conflict of interest.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing these comments, a topic-ban may be requested.|sig=yes}}

ĕ== June 2021 ==

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 20:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry, I thought the article was fine. Thevikingovikingo (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Emat20211[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ezequiel Matthysse (June 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Walter Ezequiel Matthysse Jr. per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Walter Ezequiel Matthysse Jr.. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]