User talk:Tigerland81379
|
March 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lamut, Ifugao has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bfriendster\.com\b (links: http://www.profiles.friendster.com/51094052).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
A page you started (Executive Agenda (2013-2016)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Executive Agenda (2013-2016), Tigerland81379!
Wikipedia editor Dr. Kadzi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello! I added an under construction banner for you to help stop edit conflicts! Thank you for your contributions.
To reply, leave a comment on Dr. Kadzi's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A kitten for you!
[edit]mew
Kadzi (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Executive Agenda (2013-2016) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- under construction, but has not been edited in over a week. Note to page creator: remember to draft first.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kikichugirl inquire 19:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)