How about you understand the idea of an encyclopedia written by volunteers that is very incomplete, and poorly written to such a degree that the ideas are poorly expressed. Did I step on your territory? Pardon me, I'll be sure not to do that again, provided you tell me where your territory lies. When I get a response that is complete, concise and intelligible I will be satisfied and not post such questions. In the meantime such questions might prompt an improvement to the article. By they way, do you know how thuggish you sound? Zedshort (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
You might want to re-examine the types of questions you are asking. Spamming the same question in different variants in different places with little direct relation to specific parts of the article is obnoxious and unconstructive.TR 20:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Always nice to have another opinion and perspective. But I don't answer to you, and I most certainly will not check with you or anyone else before I ask questions. Posting a question and getting wishy-wasey answers is not satisfying to me. Asking the question twice is not "spamming". If you have a problem with my behavior I admonish you to take your complaint to a higher level. Finally, you seriously need to check your tone. Zedshort (talk) 20:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Speaking of tone, you might want to consider examining your own.
Please be reminded that talk pages are not for asking general questions about a subject (as you have been doing a lot).TR 21:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Really? I have looked at your contributions and see you have had a great many run-ins with other people. Perhaps you are confused and alarmed by my coming here to talk to you and find that disturbing. My actions and tone are perfectly appropriate. Yes, it is appropriate to ask questions to prompt clarification of an article, and really, rule quoting is the last result of a weak mind. Again, if you have a problem with my behavior take it to a higher level. Time to grow up. Zedshort (talk) 23:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, TimothyRias. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.