User talk:Toghome
Welcome[edit]
|
Super Hi-Res Chess[edit]
I'm the one who started the article on Super Hi-Res Chess, a program I remember fondly from the early Apple II days. Do you know where any reliable-source references can be found about it so the article can be properly referenced? Were there any magazines or books that mentioned it? Did "Hi-Res" in its title have a hyphen in it or not? *Dan T.* (talk) 01:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Reply: I have added the only cite I have to the article, one from the ACM that pretty much covers everything in the article. I think Fire in the Valley talked about it, but it is out of print and I no longer have a copy. Hi-res was originally spelled, "HIRES," (all caps), which ensured that no one could pronounce it. It was later spelled Hi-Res, as I did when using it in the name of my program, Super Hi-Res Chess.
- Super Hi-Res Chess has been nominated for deletion; do you have anything to add that could save it? I hate to see such an interesting piece of computing history get sent to the dustbin. *Dan T.* (talk) 03:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Conflict of interest policy[edit]
Hello Toghome. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Usability testing, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 03:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Continued use of your publications as references[edit]
I suggest you start a discussion at WP:COIN concerning your editing. Would your blog and book be considered a reliable source in the contexts you've used them? Perhaps. Should you be adding the information yourself? I think it would be better if you didn't and instead followed WP:COI more closely. --Ronz (talk) 19:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Ads, pain in the butt[edit]
Go to my preferences, Gadgets and at the end of the first section called "Browsing" there is an option to "Suppress display of the fundraiser banner". If you checkbox that, and save, the messages should stop. Chzz ► 06:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
You Deserve[edit]
A Barnstar...
|
The Editor's Barnstar | |
| Good job on the tardigrade article. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC) |
October 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to IEEE 802.11ac may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }}</ref>
- |}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Toghome. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bumble Sort (Prank Algorithm)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bumble Sort (Prank Algorithm), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
- It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk│📝contribs) 21:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, Toghome,
- Unless you can document this incident with reliable sources, this article will be deleted. We have a higher bar for article verification than we did in the 2000s. Liz Read! Talk! 01:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- The story is true, and David Eisenberg went on to be an important individual in the early days of Apple computer. I have included the story of his bumble sort in a factual book about the forgotten heroes of Apple's early history that I'm currently writing. Using the Bumble Sort incident as an introduction to extensive information about the critical work David did at Apple, developing the first-ever introductory tutorial ever shipped with a computer as well as being one of the two programmer-designers responsible for Apple Super-Pilot, a powerful courseware development language that changed education forever. I'm happy for you to delete the article until such time as the new book is published and a proper cite exists. Bruce Tognazzini 17:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- And they're trying to delete Super Hi-Res Chess too... the deletionists are after all this computer nostalgia. *Dan T.* (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)