User talk:TonyMorris68

Welcome!

Hello, TonyMorris68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to U Thant Island. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! epicgenius (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting capitals into article names

Please stop inserting capitals and hyphens into article names as you did here and here. The Wikipedia articles are White separatism, White nationalism, Holocaust denial, and Antisemitism. Also, please do not insert duplicate articles into templates, as you did here; article links only go in a template in one place. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Preview button and navboxes

Hello. You might find the Help:Show preview feature useful. This will allow you to test out changes to make sure they work as intended, and helps keep article edit summaries tidy.

Also, please take a look at WP:LINKBACK. Navboxes (such as Template:racism) are intended to be added to articles which also link to those same articles. This way, all articles in a navbox are linked to each other through that navbox.

Generally, navboxes should be tightly focused. For example, "racism" is a very broad topic covering much of the Earth's history. It would not be possible to include every article related to racism in that navbox. Stormfront (website) is already linked through two other navboxes which are narrower in scope, and likely more useful to readers. Wikipedia:Navigation template and WP:NAVBOX explain more. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

The following is just for your information and does not imply any wrongdoing by you.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 15:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Kuklinski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grayfell Political Activism

Do not post on my talk page again. Grayfell (talk) 09:09, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place for you to push your POV politics on other people. Go to the talk page if you wish to remove official links. TonyMorris68 (talk) 09:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grayfell and Slatersteven political activist edit war

You now appear to be edit warring over at David Duke, please stop and gain consensus.Slatersteven (talk) 09:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be coordinated team-edit warring with grayfell, do not abuse your account on WIkipedia. Go to talk page on the article. You need to get consensus to delete official links. TonyMorris68 (talk) 09:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it was official it would be verified, it is not so it is not official. Also it is down to you to make a case for inclusion, not down to use to make a case for exclusion. Revert again and I will report you, please read wp:editwar before making any more reverts..Slatersteven (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links don't require for everything to be verified. His website links to those videos and his twitter account tweets those videos. Wikipedia is not a place for you to push your political agenda. TonyMorris68 (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No but to claim a youtube channel is his it does have to be a verified account, just because he links to it does not make it official, only used by him. And I am also warning you that if you make one more PA dismissing an eds concerns in this way I will also report you.Slatersteven (talk) 09:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well I seem to be alone in thinking this is not provably his official youtube channel.Slatersteven (talk) 10:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. I am required by policy to notify you of this thread. Grayfell (talk) 09:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forget that, you're indeffed per ANI consensus. Contact WP:ARBCOM for any appeals. Courcelles (talk) 19:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]