User talk:Tovegrant
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! Tovegrant,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
|
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 20:41, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
BRD
[edit]It's generally bad form to revert another editor's reversion of your own edits as you recently did at University of Utah. It's great that you added new material to the article but when another editor objects to your edits enough to revert them then you should begin a discussion in the article's Talk page instead of beginning an edit war. That allows us to seek a consensus about the material in question instead of having editor's battle it out with reverts and limited comments in edit summaries.
So could you please revert your edits and open a discussion in Talk? Thanks so much! ElKevbo (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Sorry, haven't had the need to revert anything before, was not aware of what is an is not in good form. I personally would have thought you'd talk to me before deleting it in the first place. I have never had anyone just delete my contribution. It looks like it's been deleted. I think I'll just leave it like that, I don't have the energy to argue. If the article can have a section on a bike path then I don't see why it can't have a section on student rights. If you feel like you would like to put it back int he content is here, thanks. Tovegrant (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Student Rights
[edit]The University of Utah provides it's students with a Student Bill of Rights. This primarily contains rights which are already legally protected, but also contains a few institution specific rights which are not mandated by the state or federal government. These include, for instance, classroom rights and academic freedom rights.[1] The university also has a Faculty Code which regulates faculty conduct, effectively providing students with additional rights. This information, however, is not contained in the student code, in one comprehensive document so students may find it difficult to access all student rights information available. The following are the rights contained in the University of Utah Student Code of Rights and Responsibilities and the Faculty Code. Many of these are rather vague, however, and may not be specific enough to limit arbitrary, capricious or discriminatory decision making.[2]
Student Code[3] Thinking and Learning Environment Rights
- Right to teaching reflecting student dignity and their rights as persons (may be referring to civil rights)
- Right to academic freedom and autonomy in their intellectual pursuits and development
- Right to courtesy and respect
Classroom Rights
- Right to reasonable notice of the general content of the course
- Right to reasonable notice of what will be required of them
- Right to reasonable notice of the criteria upon which their performance will be evaluated
- Right to performance evaluation which is prompt
- Right to performance evaluation which is conscientious
- Right to performance evaluation without prejudice or favoritism
- Right to performance evaluation consistent with the criteria stated at the beginning of the course
University Governance Rights
- Right to participate in the formulation and application of University policy affecting academic and student affairs through clearly defined means
- Right to membership on appropriate committees and administrative bodies
- Right to perform student evaluations of faculty members
- Right to examine and publish the numerical results of those evaluations
- Right to have those evaluations considered in the retention, promotion, tenure and post-tenure reviews of faculty members.
Due Process Rights
- Right to due process in any proceeding involving the possibility of substantial sanctions
- Right to be heard
- Right to decision and review by impartial persons or bodies
- Right to adequate notice of due process procedures
Freedom from Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Rights
- Right to freedom from illegal discrimination and sexual harassment (based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, age, or status as an individual with a disability, or as a protected veteran)
Freedom of Expression Rights
- Right to examine and communicate ideas by any lawful means
- Right to exercise constitutionally protected freedom of association, assembly, expression and the press
Privacy and Confidentiality Rights
- Right to privacy and confidentiality subject to reasonable University rules and regulations.
- Right to privacy in matters shared in confidence (including, but not limited to, information about a student's views, beliefs and political associations)
- Right to freedom from unreasonable search and seizure (what is unreasonable?)
Access to Student Record Rights
- Right to protection against unauthorized disclosures of confidential information contained in their educational records
- Right to examine and challenge information contained in their educational records.
Student Organization Rights
- Right to participate in elections for the student government body
- Right to form student organizations for any lawful purpose
Faculty Code (the faculty code also contains faculty responsibilities which can be seen as student rights which are not binding)[4]
- Responsible for attending all classes
- Responsible for canceling classes only for valid reasons
- Responsible for preparing for class and coming organized to teach
- Responsible for teaching material appropriate to the level and class objectives
- Responsible for maintaining regular office hours for consultation with students
- Responsible for staying on topic and refraining from wasting students time with unrelated topics
- Responsible for remaining unbiased int heir viewpoints, rewarding agreement or penalizing disagreement
- Responsible for refraining from using positions of authority to gain from students
- Responsible for giving students credit for their work and refraining from plagiarism
- Responsible for following through on agreements
- Responsible for keeping accurate records
- Responsible for keeping research and administrative duties out of class
- Responsible for upholding common practices of their field and not participating in professional misconduct
- Responsible for being honest[5]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Tovegrant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Proposed Article
[edit]Hi
I wrote the following:
American student rights to read The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) through its Executive Committee reaffirmed ther Guideline on the Students Right to Read in November 2012. The statement was first developed in 198. It was modified in April 2009 in compliance with the NCTE Policy on the Involvement of People of Color. Another revision was made in September 2018. http://www2.ncte.org/statement/righttoreadguideline/ The Students’ Right to Read presents resources that can facilitate discussions and guarantee students’ unhampered access to all texts. The beginning of the Students’ Right to Read refers to an original NCTE statement entitled, “Request for Reconsideration of a Work,” prepared by the Committee on the Right to Read of the National Council of Teachers of English.” The present Students’ Right to Read statement embodies a revised second edition building on the work of NCTE members that will ensure students have the freedom to choose to read any text and prevent “efforts of individuals or groups to curtail the freedom of choice of others.” Freedom of Speech: The Students' Right to Read (And Speak): Sources for Help in Formulating Policy Thomas L. Tedford The English Journal Vol. 63, No. 9 (Dec. 1974), pp. 14-16 Censorship is one of the threats to education. The problem of censorship is that it does not give students an adequate and clear picture of values, ideals, and issues of their culture. Donelson, K. L. (1972). The students' right to read. Urbana, Ill.]: National Council of Teachers of English. Censorship in schools has become a complex situation. Variables involved affect the way young students learn as well as the method of schools in educating children. Censorship in educational institutions is a complex situation because there are many variables that can affect the way children learn and the manner by which schools educate young learners. Censorship in schools usually exists in the form of the removal or manipulation of materials or learning processes. Censorship in Schools Victoria Sherrow Enslow, 1996 - Juvenile Nonfiction - 128 pages NCAC The National Coalition against Censorship (NCAC) compiled materials related to censorship in schools that students, parents, and educators can use.
Do you find it relevant or useful?
Will appreciate your feedback.
Thank you