User talk:Tridibs

Welcome!

Hello, Tridibs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 21 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jeet filmography page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Official Logo GEPL.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Official Logo GEPL.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grassroot Entertainment (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No notability established. Your sources are just passing mentions. Some don't even mention the company. Sources should give extensive in-depth coverage with one paragraph or more. Cite third party sources: mainstream publication, magazines, newspapers and books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grassroot Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grassroot Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tridibs! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 12:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grassroot Entertainment (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Changes since last submission only added promotional content. Issue of notability not shown with quality references is addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grassroot Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grassroot Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Grassroot Entertainment

Hello, Tridibs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grassroot Entertainment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Pavel (film director) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very Happy

I am very happy that you have beautifully articulate the page. Much Better than me. Thank you. Tridibs (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thank you. Can you please re edit the article using neutral english? Thank you. Tridibs (talk) 01:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-neutral language, your opinions, etc.

Hi there, though your efforts are appreciated, the entirety of the content you added in these edits is problematic for one reason or another:

Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia and as such, we are supposed to use neutral language to describe subjects. We are not here to lavish praise or eviscerate article subjects. Words like "all-time blockbuster", "blockbuster", "hit", "superhit", "failure", "flop", "disaster", "rotten", or any other declaration issued by the Indian media, is not appropriate for inclusion. Phrases like "the film was considered successful" or "the film did not perform well at the box office" are closer to neutral, but such claims would have to be properly sourced, meaning you'd have to find a source that says explicitly that the film performed a certain way.
Same thing with claims like "Jeet went on becoming most favourite hero of cinegoirs". We're not here to add our personal opinions or evaluations about a subject's popularity or impact on society. Any such content would need to be attributed to a reliable source, and again, we would use neutral language, which "favourite hero" would not be. Same with "his most anticipated film", "it was indeed a great turnover around year of Jeet", "intense", "which is one of a kind - a solid content oriented project", "The concept of this film is very new and fresh in this industry", etc. This content, like the "blockbuster", "superhit" stuff, reads like an advertisement. I don't even know what "that film changed the business dynamics of Industry" is supposed to mean, because you provided no context. What changed? How did it change? You can't make grandiose claims without providing sufficient context.
Then there are the glaring factual inaccuracies: The 2002 film Sathi, according to you, "became the highest grossing film of that year". True? No. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers was the highest grossing film of 2002. "Dui Prithibi was the highest grosser of 2010". Nope. Toy Story 3. "Besh Korechi Prem Korechi which turns out to be the biggest opener of 2015". No, that was probably "Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens". Do you see the issue? If what is meant is "highest opening for an Indian Bengali-language film", then that's what should be said. Again, bold claims require proper context.
Other issues: we need consistency in English grammar, spelling, capitalisation, etc. And there are specific rules for when we use bold and when we use italics. You should probably read our Manual of Style. Generally speaking, film titles, album titles, books, television series are italicised. We also typically only use bold in the lead the first time we mention the article subject.

Please keep these issues in mind going forward. In the interim, I have reverted your edits. You might want to do your work in your sandbox rather than editing the article directly. This might give you more time to make improvements. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it Tridibs (talk) 10:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeetz Filmworks

The article Jeetz Filmworks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH₂₁^talk 10:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeetz Filmworks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeetz Filmworks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.grassrootent.com/who-we-are/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — MarkH₂₁^talk 10:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]