User talk:Tssfan

Welcome!

Hello, Tssfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 15:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-play

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Fair-play, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.fair-play.com/companyprofile.php. As a copyright violation, Fair-play appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Fair-play has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Fair-play. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Fair-play, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 15:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:ElmerFosterFP.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:ElmerFosterFP.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:ElmerFosterFP.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:ElmerFosterFP.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Mp50FP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mp50FP.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Matthew F. Walicke

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Matthew F. Walicke, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Matthew F. Walicke seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Matthew F. Walicke, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 03:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ProLine Message Center Editor

ProLine Message Center Editor, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that ProLine Message Center Editor satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProLine Message Center Editor and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of ProLine Message Center Editor during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Ksero (leave me a message, things I've done) 11:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Donnell Stadium (Findlay High Schooll)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Donnell Stadium (Findlay High Schooll), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. DMacks (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ku Klux Klan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 15:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Separate but equal, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Separate but equal was changed by Tssfan (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-14T15:18:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Scoreboard.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You removed mention of several major scoreboard manufacturers from this article for no reason. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You offer absolutely, positively no proof of what you say. You need to cite references so that we can verify that you're not just making up what you say. The warning stands. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given the warning above about your work on "Fair-Play," it appears to me you have some sort of connection to Fair Play Scoreboards, a competitor to S'portable and the others. This would mean you are in violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies. Moreover, the information you cited in your last message to me is not publicly available, or at least you have not provided citations (as I required of you in the message above) to prove what you say. The information would seem to be available only to an "insider," someone who works for one of the companies. Your emphasis on the lack of S'portable's use in pro sports also indicates that you work for Fair Play. What you are attempting to do is a very blatant violation f Wikipedia policy and, given your previous action, grounds for blocking or permanent banning. I'm going to give you one more chance to provide independent sources to prove what you say, and you must do so in very short order, or you will be blocked. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel, I appreciate your comments and your love of scoreboards. However, I think we are making much too much about whether or not one company is bigger than the other, but it is important that all facts presented in a Wikipedia article have independent, verifiable references cited - a lot like a research paper in school. This page tells all about what you need. We can't just go on your say-so or have everyone call up the companies - that would run against policies against original research anyway. I suggest we include all companies, and remove the section that refers to "six largest" or similar phrasing.

I was fascinated by scoreboards at your age (and earlier). My first scoreboard in my sixth-grade school had a clock face with hands, and lights beside a row of digits that indicated the score. It broke down for good that year. I moved up to a slightly-newer Naden in junior high, and a gondola-style Fair-Play in high school (installed in 1963) that was only replaced about 10 years ago. I work as a newspaper sportswriter, and I think every high school in the Birmingham area uses Daktronics. They have sponsorship deals with Coca-Cola and Pepsi, which pay Daktronics to put their logos on the boards and the schools get the boards for free. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:45, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hadn't heard about Naden. Their display units are used a lot on The Price is Right, like on "Contestant's Row." Not surprised they've stopped manufacturing, though, as their technology was way behind the times. Looks like Daktronics (which makes a lot of outside displays like gasoline price boards) and Fair Play are pretty much the top companies right now. I like Daktronics myself, except for their controllers with the buttons that you have to press so hard. Haven't actually run a Fair Play in more than a decade. There are a few Electro-Mechs around here, mainly at small schools that couldn't get a Coke or Pepsi sponsorship to pay for a board; the company is located about 150 miles or so away. There's one installation locally with three Nevcos in a building that has two basketball and one wheelchair rugby court - it's a training site for Olympic and Paralympic athletes. I ran one there once, and hated the controller. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MP-70

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article MP-70, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MP-50

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article MP-50, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, articles about the controllers themselves was not a good idea. They simply aren't notable by Wikipedia standards, no more than specific scoreboard models. I forget what model number the Dak controller was — the school closed, unfortunately. But it ran the garden-variety LED high school basketball/volleyball scoreboard with changeable inserts, and had a 2-line LCD readout. It was about three or four years old. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scoreboard companies

No, just have a section called "Scoreboard manufacturers" and list them all in alphabetical order. People will still add and remove entries at times - such is the nature of Wikipedia. Nothing you can do about it. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Video boards? Don't have any experience with them. In my line of work I deal with high schools, which generally do not have video boards at their fields. The only exception I know of around here is [[Hoover High School (Alabama)], which plays its football games at Regions Paark, which installed a news video board a couple of years ago. (Don't know which company made it.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

This page tells it all: WP:REF. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:LISShowtrax.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LISShowtrax.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ShowTrax.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:ShowTrax.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fair Play Scoreboards

The article Fair Play Scoreboards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hasn't had a single source added to indicate notability for the best part of a decade. Clearly fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui ^雲 _水 21:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ShowTrax

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ShowTrax requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]